<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Does waiting for the reply, impact the timing of any of the further
review obligations we have?<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/7/2015 8:58 PM, Milton L Mueller
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:b58ec5db011e4193b841c0f913e8b591@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Alissa is
awaiting suggestions for a date for a response to this
question.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">My suggestion
is that we request that they tell us within 30 days _<i>how</i>_
they plan to go about resolving this issue (e.g., meetings,
etc.) and once they respond in that way we ask them to
suggest a timeline for how quickly they think they can
resolve it. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in
0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Milton L Mueller<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, February 7, 2015 8:50 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Jennifer Chung; 'ICG'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Internal-cg] Action items from ICG
Face-to-Face Meeting #4, 6-7 February 2015<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Jennifer,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">You forgot
the question we agreed to send jointly to the numbers and
protocol parameters group.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">I was
responsible for this, but yesterday when I said it was
“done” I meant that the question had been approved by the
group. I do not think it was “finished” in the sense that
we have formally transmitted it to the two OCs. I would
like to know how that will be done, and when.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">For
everyone’s reference, here is the agreed question:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The IETF consensus as reflected
in draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response did not include a formal
request to change the arrangements regarding the IANA
trademark and the
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://iana.org">iana.org</a>
domain as a requirement of its transition proposal. But
Section III.A.2 of the RIR proposal says: <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">"With regards to the IANA trademark and
the <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://IANA.ORG">
IANA.ORG</a> domain, it is the expectation of the Internet
Number Community that both are associated with the IANA
Numbering Services and not with a particular IANA Numbering
Services Operator. Identifying an organization that is not
the IANA Numbering Services Operator and which will
permanently hold these assets will facilitate a smooth
transition should another operator (or operators) be
selected in the future. It is the preference of the Internet
Number Community that the IANA trademark and the
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://IANA.ORG">IANA.ORG</a>
domain name be transferred to an entity independent of the
IANA Numbering Services Operator, in order to ensure that
these assets are used in a non-discriminatory manner for the
benefit of the entire community. From the Internet Number
Community’s perspective, the IETF Trust would be an
acceptable candidate for this role.” <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The numbers proposal sees these changes
as a requirement of the transition and the protocols
parameters proposal does not. If these aspects of the
proposals are perceived as incompatible would the numbers
and protocol parameters communities be willing to modify
their proposals to reconcile them?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue
1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org">
internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jennifer Chung<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, February 7, 2015 6:40 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'ICG'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Internal-cg] Action items from ICG
Face-to-Face Meeting #4, 6-7 February 2015<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello All,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">As reviewed by the ICG chairs, please
find the list of action items from the ICG Face-to-Face
Meeting #4 below:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">1. Secretariat to summarize
questions/answers resolved internally about the protocol
parameters proposal and numbers proposal discussed.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. Arkko to compile a list of for a
request for information from the protocol parameters
community re jurisdiction, NTIA oversight and send it to
internal-cg list.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">3. Wilson to request clarification from
CRISP team, questions put forth by Arasteh (regarding
Section II.B.2 and III.A of the numbers proposal).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">4. ICG chairs to review details of the
proposal finalization process and refine ICG timeline with
assistance from Secretariat.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">5. Ismail, Arasteh, St. Amour,
Alhadeff, Subrenat to continue working on community
comments handling document with suggestions put forward by
other ICG members.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">6. ICG to continue to discuss and agree
on talking points and ICG chairs to send bullet points for
Monday session on the internal-cg list.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">7. Fältström to communicate with
CWG-IANA and CCWG-Accountability before coordinating ICG
teleconference schedule.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best Regards,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jennifer<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org">Internal-cg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>