<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Dear Patrik</div><div>Let us not play with words</div><div>Someone in ICG clearly told that ICG does not expect any input from CCGG work stream 1</div><div>I did not agree to that statement now Milton very rightly remind all of us that there is a direct link between ICG and CCWG work stream 1 .</div><div>Tks Kavouss </div><div> <br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 13 Feb 2015, at 10:38, Patrik Fältström <<a href="mailto:paf@frobbit.se">paf@frobbit.se</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 13 feb 2015, at 09:15, Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" class="">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: LucidaSans-Typewriter; font-size: 10px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">'ICG does not expect any input from CCWG .I did severely disagree with that statement but since no one else than me raised that issue I did not raise it again but in CCWG I mentioned that the sole purpose of Work Steam 1 was exactly to provide the accountability required to be in place or committed before transition is take place.</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">My view:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There is no contradiction between the two statements. It is all a question on what you mean by "input from".</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The ICG and CCWG are parallell, so none of the two groups report to each other.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There is though [of course] a requirement that there is no contradiction between the two outputs.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Because of that, coordination is needed.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">But for me, that does not imply one group give input to the other, because to me "input to" implies one group report to the other, which I do not think we do.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> Patrik</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></blockquote></body></html>