<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear All,</div><div>Some of us are bipolar that means speaks in such a way that mtheir vierws are always abstantive.</div><div>Such course of action may not be very productive that someone d.</div><div>Athis eems not very apprerciated speak bipolary.</div><div>Either we have view one or view two</div><div>WE May have another view between the two</div><div>That is also ggod</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-02-24 22:42 GMT+01:00 joseph alhadeff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
to the extent appropriate? It is not unreasonable for us to ask
that they take account of what's already been drafted, that doesn't
bind them to it merely informs them of the potential benefits of
drafting that could avoid conflicts.<div><div class="h5"><br>
<div>On 2/24/2015 3:49 PM, michael niebel
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">The phrasing - although softened e.g by "to the
extent possible" - would still imply that it is the "latecomer"
community that would have to adapt to the "first mover"
proposals to assure consistency.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best</div>
<div>Michael</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:42 PM, joseph
alhadeff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div> The phrasing could be adjusted to assure the tone is
advisory. Something along the lines of... ICG would
welcome the names community's review of existing community
proposals and other related work of the ICG in preparation
of its proposal to assure, to the extent possible, both
consistency and avoidance of conflicts with existing
proposals. Such a review for consistency and conflict
avoidance process within the Names proposal development
process would enable us to assemble the final proposal
more expeditiously.<br>
<div>On 2/24/2015 1:24 PM, James M. Bladel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Agreed, this could be received as the ICG
“advising” the CWG on its output. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>They have the RFP, and we can safely assume this
operational community’s response will be larger and
more complex than the others.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks—</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>J.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span>
<div> <span>From: </span>michael niebel <<a href="mailto:fmniebel@gmail.com" target="_blank">fmniebel@gmail.com</a>><br>
<span>Date: </span>Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at
11:15 <br>
<span>To: </span>Daniel Karrenberg <<a href="mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net" target="_blank">daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net</a>><br>
<span>Cc: </span>ICG List <<a href="mailto:internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">internal-cg@icann.org</a>><br>
<span>Subject: </span>Re: [Internal-cg] Timeline
and proposal finalization process updates<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Daniel,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am not sure whether the addition that you
propose - although factually correct - could
not be interpreted as inappropriately
prescriptive through the backdoor.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Michael</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at
2:16 PM, Daniel Karrenberg <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net" target="_blank">daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"> <br>
The actions before we receive the CWG
response are very reasonable and I support
them. I am ambivalent as far as a public
comment period is concerned.<br>
<br>
I still believe we should tell the CWG that
we are prepared to work as expeditiously as
possible once we receive their proposal and
ask them to let us know if there are any
changes in their delivery date.<br>
<br>
I also propose to add this to what we say:
"The time that the ICG will need to produce
its output will be shortest if the CWG
response is simple, has little or no
dependencies on other work and is compatible
with the responses already received from the
protocol parameters and numbers
communities."<br>
<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
On 23.02.15 18:22 , Alissa Cooper wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"> ...<br>
(1) What does the ICG plan to do before
receiving the CWG proposal?<br>
(2) What does the ICG plan to do after
receiving the CWG proposal?<br>
...<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span> <br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>