<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear All,</div><div>Some of us are bipolar that means speaks   in such a way that mtheir vierws are always abstantive.</div><div>Such course of action may not be very productive that someone d.</div><div>Athis eems not very apprerciated  speak bipolary.</div><div>Either we have view one or view two</div><div>WE May have another view between the two</div><div>That is also ggod</div><div>Kavouss  </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-02-24 22:42 GMT+01:00 joseph alhadeff <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    to the extent appropriate?  It is not unreasonable for us to ask
    that they take account of what&#39;s already been drafted, that doesn&#39;t
    bind them to it merely informs them of the potential benefits of
    drafting that could avoid conflicts.<div><div class="h5"><br>
    <div>On 2/24/2015 3:49 PM, michael niebel
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">The phrasing - although softened e.g by &quot;to the
        extent possible&quot; - would still imply that it is the &quot;latecomer&quot;
        community  that would have to adapt to the &quot;first mover&quot;
        proposals to assure consistency.
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Best</div>
        <div>Michael</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:42 PM, joseph
          alhadeff <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>&gt;</span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote">
            <div> The phrasing could be adjusted to assure the tone is
              advisory.  Something along the lines of... ICG would
              welcome the names community&#39;s review of existing community
              proposals and other related work of the ICG in preparation
              of its proposal to assure, to the extent possible, both
              consistency and avoidance of conflicts with existing
              proposals.  Such a review for consistency and conflict
              avoidance process within the Names proposal development
              process would enable us to assemble the final proposal
              more expeditiously.<br>
              <div>On 2/24/2015 1:24 PM, James M. Bladel wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <div>Agreed, this could be received as the ICG
                  “advising” the CWG on its output.  </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>They have the RFP, and we can safely assume this
                  operational community’s response will be larger and
                  more complex than the others.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Thanks—</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>J.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <span>
                  <div> <span>From: </span>michael niebel &lt;<a href="mailto:fmniebel@gmail.com" target="_blank">fmniebel@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
                    <span>Date: </span>Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at
                    11:15 <br>
                    <span>To: </span>Daniel Karrenberg &lt;<a href="mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net" target="_blank">daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net</a>&gt;<br>
                    <span>Cc: </span>ICG List &lt;<a href="mailto:internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">internal-cg@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
                    <span>Subject: </span>Re: [Internal-cg] Timeline
                    and proposal finalization process updates<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div dir="ltr">Daniel,
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>I am not sure whether the addition that you
                          propose - although factually correct - could
                          not be interpreted as inappropriately
                          prescriptive through the backdoor.</div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>Michael</div>
                      </div>
                      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                        <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at
                          2:16 PM, Daniel Karrenberg <span dir="ltr">
                            &lt;<a href="mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net" target="_blank">daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net</a>&gt;</span>
                          wrote:<br>
                          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"> <br>
                            The actions before we receive the CWG
                            response are very reasonable and I support
                            them. I am ambivalent as far as a public
                            comment period is concerned.<br>
                            <br>
                            I still believe we should tell the CWG that
                            we are prepared to work as expeditiously as
                            possible once we receive their proposal and
                            ask them to let us know if there are any
                            changes in their delivery date.<br>
                            <br>
                            I also propose to add this to what we say:
                            &quot;The time that the ICG will need to produce
                            its output will be shortest if the CWG
                            response is simple, has little or no
                            dependencies on other work and is compatible
                            with the responses already received from the
                            protocol parameters and numbers
                            communities.&quot;<br>
                            <br>
                            Daniel<br>
                            <br>
                            On 23.02.15 18:22 , Alissa Cooper wrote:<br>
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"> ...<br>
                              (1) What does the ICG plan to do before
                              receiving the CWG proposal?<br>
                              (2) What does the ICG plan to do after
                              receiving the CWG proposal?<br>
                              ...<br>
                              <br>
                            </blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
                            Internal-cg mailing list<br>
                            <a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
                            <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
                          </blockquote>
                        </div>
                        <br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </span> <br>
                <fieldset></fieldset>
                <br>
                <pre>_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a>
</pre>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </div>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Internal-cg mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
            <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>