[IOT] Meta-questions about IOT

[Malcolm Hutty]

I've noticed that when Becky acted as Rapporteur CCWG WG2 her preferred 
method of reporting was orally to the group in plenary, sometimes 
supported with Powerpoint slides but without a formal report. But I'm 
not sure that this group has the same status as WG2, and may work 
differently.

That recollection made me wonder what the proposed working method and 
output of this group would be.

Specifically,

i) To whom is this committee reporting? To the Board, or to the CCWG?

ii) Will this committee produce a written draft recommended set of rules 
of procedures? If not,
a) who will?
b) what will we produce to direct that person/entity?

iii) Will this committee produce a narrative statement in support of its 
recommendations?

iv) Will members of this committee have an opportunity to provide an 
accompanying statement, either dissenting on individual points or on the 
recommendations as a whole, as was offered to CCWG members on the CCWG 
Report?

If I recall correctly, the draft rules of procedure must be published by 
the Board for public comment before adoption - but I may be mistaken 
about that.

FWIW, I hope the answers to questions (ii) to (iv) is yes, yes and yes.


Malcolm.
-- 
             Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
    Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
  London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                  London Internet Exchange Ltd
            Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ

          Company Registered in England No. 3137929
        Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA