[IOT] FW: QUESTION FOR ACTION FW: [Ext] Request for 2-week extension of public comment period on IRP Supplemental Procedures

[Greg Shatan]

David,

If the BC follows a procedure similar to IPC, any comment is supposed to be
on the general mailing list for a week after it is drafted (by a drafting
team, typically), so that the membership can read and comment and revise
the comment before it is submitted.  (Sometimes, the period is shorter than
a week, due to a variety of circumstances, but IPC aims for a week.)  A one
week extension may not allow sufficient time for the comment to be revised
and then put on the list.  I think it's fair to assume that Steve would not
ask for such an extension lightly, since he has been in our shoes (and your
shoes) before. So, I think we should give his request every benefit of the
doubt.

I would suggest (a) a dialogue with Steve about the shortest time he and
the BC can get this done, and (b) you figure out the latest we can receive
it without pushing our timeline back (and any subsequent "knock-on" effects
from that push-back), and share that with Steve.

Greg

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:33 PM, McAuley, David <dmcauley at verisign.com>
wrote:

> Dear IRP IOT members,
>
>
>
> I just saw this note this morning.
>
>
>
> I am tempted to agree a ONE WEEK extension later today but wanted you to
> see this first.
>
>
>
> This would give a requested extension but would also allow us a good
> chance to look at comments and staff write-up at our next meeting Feb. 9th.
>
>
>
>
> If you have concerns please let me know. Because of the short time frame
> with deadline looming I am planning to agree the one week extension later
> today – sorry this is such a short-fuse item.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> David McAuley
>
> International Policy Manager
>
> Verisign Inc.
>
> 703-948-4154 <(703)%20948-4154>
>
>
>
> *From:* Karen Mulberry [mailto:karen.mulberry at icann.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2017 9:24 PM
> *To:* McAuley, David; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Mathieu Weill; Thomas
> Rickert (thomas at rickert.net)
> *Cc:* ACCT-Staff
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] QUESTION FOR ACTION FW: [Ext] Request for 2-week
> extension of public comment period on IRP Supplemental Procedures
>
>
>
> I have just received a request for an additional extension to the IOT-IRP
> Public Comment period on the IRP Supplemental Procedures.
>
>
>
> Please let me know if you wish to grant this request for an additional
> extension to the Public Comment period.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> *Karen Mulberry*
>
> Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI)
>
> ICANN
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 7:15 PM
> *To: *Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry at icann.org>
> *Cc: *BC Executive Committee <bc-excomm at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] Request for 2-week extension of public comment period on
> IRP Supplemental Procedures
>
>
>
> Hi, Karen.
>
>
>
> As the staff contact for Updated Supplementary Procedures for the
> IRP[icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_irp-2Dsupp-2Dprocedures-2D2016-2D11-2D28-2Den&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=Q_fMdPzWh_dPIFRoT0_RCyUZ-mS0xeE4EeQTxa_ckQI&m=WCws5VokF-q1trXfNjFDT4Bd1j1VoFNdzrbyH2mc7G0&s=ytvyKVEZ_Bqi2Qmydd-mrhrGmFwdVIYIN8R6fPb125k&e=>,
> we are contacting you to formally request a 2-week extension to the public
> comment period.
>
>
>
> The period is scheduled to end 25-Jan, and we are requesting an extension
> to 8-Feb, at the earliest.
>
>
>
> The justification to grant this extension is that we only just received a
> legal analysis and recommendations for the proposed procedures.    Sidley
> Austin, attorneys to the CCWG, prepared a legal memo (attached) that was
> shared with the BC membership only last week (12-Jan).   We’d like to
> incorporate some of Sidley’s analysis, and need additional time to have BC
> members review the changes.
>
>
>
> I do not see any great urgency to the adoption of IRP procedures, so I
> hope this request can be granted.
>
>
>
> Glad to field questions you may have about this request.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> Vice chair for policy coordination
>
> ICANN Business Constituency
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IOT mailing list
> IOT at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/attachments/20170120/89acad12/attachment.html>