[IOT] Some IRP comments treatment for Frist Reading

[Malcolm Hutty]

On 2017-05-12 16:46, McAuley, David via IOT wrote:
> Even though we appeared to agree on the call May 3rd that panelists
> would have one five-year term with no opportunity for renewal, we
> discussed that notion further yesterday and the balance tilted toward
> allowing for a one-time renewal of an additional five-year term (total
> cap on service as panelist at ten years). The discussion yesterday on
> this issue is largely captured on pages 18 - 22 of the "Raw Caption
> Notes" of the call accessible here by scrolling down:
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=64084338

I have now read the "Raw caption notes" (transcript), and I see that
Greg was the only person speaking in favour of a change of position.
Avri noted that Greg's points "had made her less certain of her 
position"
but that "I haven't completely switched over."

Nobody else expressed a view.

As a matter of process, I therefore assume that the position agreed
on the previous call remains intact. i.e. no renewal.

Kind Regards,

Malcolm


-- 
             Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
    Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
  London Internet Exchange | http://www.linx.net/publicaffairs

                  London Internet Exchange Ltd
              24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ

          Company Registered in England No. 3137929
        Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA