[IOT] IOT plans

[Robin Gross]

Thanks very much, David.  This sounds like a good path forward for our group.

All best,
Robin

> On Mar 21, 2018, at 8:57 AM, McAuley, David via IOT <iot at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear members of the IRP IOT,
>  
> It was nice to see some of you at ICANN61 last week during a very busy schedule there.
>  
> Now that ICANN61 is over and we ate catching back up I want to mention a few things about our plans to continue our work.
>  
> First, on the repose issue, I said I would go back in the archives to do a deep dive on what has happened so far – I started that work but with Adobe down it may take a bit longer than I had hoped. Bernie will let us know how things are progressing with the Adobe issue.
>  
> Meantime, we should explore further the ‘two buckets’ idea – of releasing the rules we are finished with while we wrap up work on repose and possibly other open items.
>  
> In this regard, I may send to the list a treatment of specifying the ‘required elements’ of an IRP complaint (see Bylaw section 4.3(n)(iv)(C)). I am thinking that that will probably not be a difficult issue to address. 
>  
> So, I will be writing more in the next week and look forward to connecting again.
>  
> Best wishes to all,
> David
>  
> David McAuley
> Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager
> Verisign Inc.
> 703-948-4154
>  
> _______________________________________________
> IOT mailing list
> IOT at icann.org <mailto:IOT at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/attachments/20180323/9f1f59b6/attachment.html>