[IOT] [TRUNCATED LIST] Re: [Ext] Re: [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to David McAuley - Interim Supplementary Rules for the IRP

[Malcolm Hutty]

On 23/10/2018 15:41, Samantha Eisner wrote:
> Dear Malcolm, 
> 
> The recent records of the IOT do not support your statement that you would only support the Interim Procedures without the "incompatible" subclause.  Instead, the record supports your (1) reservation of your continued objection; and (2) agreement that the interim rules could proceed so long as ICANN's commitment to make future transition arrangements was included in the Interim Procedures.  [Note, that commitment was already in a footnote and remains in there]

Dear Sam,

Thank you for your confirmation that I said at the time that I remained
of the opinion that the subclause is inconsistent with the bylaws, and
reserved my right to dispute its compatibility, as I am now doing.

It turns out quite a lot of people share my concern.

Kind Regards,

Malcolm.



-- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
           Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA