[IOT] IOT - Regular meeting Tuesday January 19th, 2021 17:00 UTC

[Ariel Manoff]

Dear All,

In Argentina the latin term Amicus has similar legal meaning than in US.

Hector

Héctor Ariel Manoff
Vitale, Manoff & Feilbogen
Viamonte 1145 10º Piso
C1053ABW Buenos Aires
República Argentina
Te: (54-11) 4371-6100
Fax: (54-11) 4371-6365
E-mail: amanoff at vmf.com.ar
Web: http://www.vmf.com.ar
****************************************************************************
************************************************************************
Esta comunicación tiene como destinatario a la persona o empresa a la cual
está dirigida y puede contener información confidencial y reservada. Si el
lector de este mensaje no es el destinatario o sus empleados o
representantes, deberá proceder a reenviar el presente a su remitente. La
distribución, diseminación o copiado de este mensaje podría constituir
violación a la ley. Gracias.
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
to recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
telephone and return the original message to us at the above address. Thank
you.
****************************************************************************
************************************************************************

-----Mensaje original-----
De: IOT [mailto:iot-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de Nigel Roberts
Enviado el: martes, 19 de enero de 2021 11:05
Para: iot at icann.org
Asunto: Re: [IOT] IOT - Regular meeting Tuesday January 19th, 2021 17:00 UTC

It seems to me that the role of intervener expresses the role better
than "amicus" -- a term that appears, at least to me, to be very US-centric.

If the role in reality lies between amicus (very limited role) on the
one hand, and "full intervener" on the other, perhaps some qualification
such as "limited intervener" might suit?

"Interested non-party" may also work.

But I would, personally, prefer something more akin to "intervener",
since the basic rationale for intervention is that a outcome in a
particular case may affect the rights of nonparties, who ideally should
have the right to be heard.


On 19/01/2021 13:55, Lee, Helen via IOT wrote:
> a concept that the degree of participation should be flexible and
> encompass that participation necessary fully to protect the rights and
> interests of the amici, including, where appropriate t
_______________________________________________
IOT mailing list
IOT at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the
website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit
the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration,
including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery
altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.