<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear All,  </div><div><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:12pt">While the language seems to be correct but it totally modifies the initial
draft either by Sidley or by ICANN,</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:12pt">I am afraid i
cannot agree to this very general language which would put us in a difficult
situation that resulting from different interpretation</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:12pt">I maintain my
initial position to agree with ICANN language but deleting the word “Clear “before
convincing <span> </span></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font></div><div>Kavouss <br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-08-11 15:48 GMT+02:00 avri doria <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">Not a lawyer, but ...<br>
<br>
Replace<br>
<br>
IRPs commenced prior to the adoption of these Updated Supplementary<br>
Procedures shall be governed by the Supplementary Procedures in effect<br>
at the time such IRPs were commenced.<br>
with<br>
<br>
IRPs commenced prior to the adoption of these Updated Supplementary<br>
Procedures shall be governed procedurally by the Supplementary<br>
Procedures in effect at the time such IRPs were commenced.<br>
In the event that any of UPS amendments would materially affect<br>
judgement on the case as presented  such amendments may be applied if a<br>
party successfully ....<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<br>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.avast.com/antiviru<wbr>s</a><br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
IOT mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:IOT@icann.org" target="_blank">IOT@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/iot</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>