<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">All,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">As a follow up to the email below and per the request today please find a Google doc per issue with the exception of the timing issues at</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><a href="https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0Bycchop8VaMWaklYSU8wVjU2Z00?usp=sharing">https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0Bycchop8VaMWaklYSU8wVjU2Z00?usp=sharing</a> </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">anyone with the above URL should be able to access and edit these docs.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">They include one document per each of the following which you can edit:</div><ul><li><div class="gmail_default" style="display:inline"></div>Types of hearings - 5</li><li>Consolidation, Intervention and Joinder - 5</li><li>Translation and Interpretation- 4</li><li>Discovery, evidence, statements - 4</li><li>Applied Retroactively to all Pending - 3</li><li>Panel Conflic of Interest - 3</li><li>Notice - 2</li><li>Rewriting Consensus Policy - 2</li><li>Standing - Materially Affected - 2</li><li>Other</li></ul><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline">I have included the material from the spreadsheet into each of these to facilitate the work in addition to providing a template to follow as a sugestion.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline">Comments appreciated.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline">If you wish to work on a topic please advise the IOT list that you will do so to avoid duplication.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline">If you pick a topic and cannot use Google Docs please contact me and I will forward you a Word version via email.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">It would be great if all the topics could be chosen by participants early - If you look at the documents you will see that some of these are very straightforward and should not require more than a few hours of an individuals time to complete and be ready to present to the IOT.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">If you have questions please feel free to contact me.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Bernard Turcotte</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2</div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline"></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Bernard Turcotte <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:turcotte.bernard@gmail.com" target="_blank">turcotte.bernard@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-size:small">All IOT participants,</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">Per David McAuley's request please find the following documents attached to this email to facilitate you analysis of the public comments on Updated Supplementary Procedures for Independent Review Process (IRP):</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">The URL for the public consultation is: <a href="https://www.icann.org/public-comments/irp-supp-procedures-2016-11-28-en" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/public-<wbr>comments/irp-supp-procedures-<wbr>2016-11-28-en</a> </div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">These include all comments as of the sending of this email (22 comments by 19 commenters - 2 commenters posted more than one comment)</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">First please find attached all the comments regrouped into one PDF file named CCWG-Accountability-WS2-<wbr>IRPIOT-PublicConsultation1-<wbr>Responses-PDFConpendium.</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">Next please find attached and Excel spread sheet named CCWG-Accountability-WS2-<wbr>IRPIOT-PublicConsultation1-<wbr>Responses-AnalysisV1.1BT</div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:small">I have produced this after going over all the comments. The first column is a list of commenters (19) and columns C to Z are the issues that were brought up in the comments regrouped into logical subsets where possible. These are:</div><div><ul><li>12 Month limit - 13</li><li>45 days - 11</li><li><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;display:inline"></div>Types of hearings - 5</li><li>Consolidation, Intervention and Joinder - 5</li><li>Translation and Interpretation- 4</li><li>Discovery, evidence, statements - 4</li><li>Applied Retroactively to all Pending - 3</li><li>Panel Conflic of Interest - 3</li><li>Notice - 2</li><li>Rewriting Consensus Policy - 2</li><li>Standing - Materially Affected - 2</li><li>Other</li></ul></div><div style="font-size:small">These are ranked by the number of comments for the issue (of the 19 commenters 13 commented on the 12 month limit, 11 on the 45 day limit etc.). Issues that had only 1 comment were grouped under Other.</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">The entries in the cells are, for the most part, extracted quotes from the comments received, which to my mind represented the core of the comment on this issue including recommendations. This is not meant to replace the original comments but simply facilitate identifying issues and trends. Everyone should read the original submissions which are included with this email.</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">Most comments were thoughtful and well articulated and focused on presenting issues. A number claim that certain proposed USP rules are incoherent with the Bylaws, providing references to support their claim, as well as providing alternative language for some of the recommendations.</div></div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:small">For those who prefer to print things out, or cannot use the Excel sheet, I have provided a printable PDF version of the spreadsheet in the file: CCWG-Accountability-WS2-<wbr>IRPIOT-PublicConsultation1-<wbr>Responses-Analysis-=<wbr>PrintableVersion. Please note that if you are printing use LANDSCAPE LETTER or A4 but that it will run about 52 pages.</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">If you have any questions or issues with these documents please feel free to contact me.</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">Have a good weekend and I look forward to our meeting next week.</div><span class="gmail-HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">Bernard Turcotte</div><div style="font-size:small">ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability</div><br></font></span></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>