[IOTF] AOB from call #5

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sat Apr 16 02:13:19 UTC 2016

Paul, regardless of whether it is in any of the reports, can you be 
more specific on the differences you are referring to. Clearly there 
rules on delegation are different, but are you saying that there are 
operational differences as well?


At 15/04/2016 09:38 PM, Trang Nguyen wrote:

>Hi Paul,
>You had raised the below topic for discussion in the AOB portion of 
>the agenda on Wednesday's IOTF call. Because we ran out of time, I 
>had suggested that we pick up this discussion in the IOTF mail list. 
>Below is what you raised on the call:
>"I've raised this a number of times on the list. Historically there 
>has always been a difference of the way in which ccs and gTLD are 
>handled or respected within the IANA frame work and obviously the 
>post transition we want the difference to continue. I don't know 
>what juncture it needs to be captured, whether it's in the Bylaws of 
>PTI, whether it's implementation recognition in the document, 
>implementation documentation. And I would welcome your guidance, as 
>to how you intend to respect the differences between the authority 
>parts for ccTLDs and gTLDs."
>Could you please point to the part in the ICG, CWG or CCWG proposal 
>that speak to any requirements for implementation on this topic?
>Thank you,
>IOTF mailing list
>IOTF at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iotf/attachments/20160415/02fbd800/attachment.html>

More information about the IOTF mailing list