[IOTF] AoB - Paul Kane - Annex C of CWG section 7 and 8.

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Wed Apr 20 18:54:29 UTC 2016


I am assuming that you are referring to the following from Annex C:

"8)   Diversity of the customers of the IANA Functions:  

i)   The IANA Functions operator needs to take account of the variety of forms of relationship with TLD operators. The proposal will need to reflect the diversity of arrangements in accountability to the direct users of the IANA Functions.  

ii)                       For ccTLDs, the IANA Functions Operator should provide a service without requiring a contract and should respect the diversity of agreements and arrangements in place for ccTLDs. In particular, the IANA Functions Operator should not impose any additional requirements on the registry unless they are directly and demonstrably linked to the global security, stability, and resilience of the DNS. "

Am I correct on that?


-----Original Message-----
From: iotf-bounces at icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul M Kane - CWG
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 1:02 PM
To: iotf at icann.org
Subject: [IOTF] AoB - Paul Kane - Annex C of CWG section 7 and 8.


To assist in tonight's call I'd just like to know where Annex C, sections 7 and
8 of the CWG proposal are captured in the transition documents/Bylaws. 

Annex C - Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship for Names Functions

This important element that of of great interest to ccTLD seem to be missing.......



PS - I invite you to speak with bart.boswinkel at icann.org as he is very aware of the need to respect the diverse ccTLD community.

IOTF mailing list
IOTF at icann.org

More information about the IOTF mailing list