[IOTF] Schedule A of the ICANN-PTI Services Agreement

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Wed Aug 24 14:33:05 UTC 2016

Well done Jonathan.  I am personally comfortable with all of your response and provide input on three of them below.

Costs (5.1)
DT-O didn't specifically review this clause or Sidley's comments but I think that the General Comment included with DT-O's comments on Schedule A may apply here: "Although not necessarily required to be in the Services Agreement, it is recommended that the PTI Operating Plan & Budget provide detailed costs for each of the Schedule A services.  This will facilitate monitoring and evaluating PTI costs corresponding to Schedule A."  I personally think that it might be helpful of invoices detailed costs by the services listed in Schedule A.  That would make it easier for the community to not only monitor costs bust also to track fulfillment of the services.

Termination by ICANN (8.2(b))
I am concerned with this wording in the clause as I think Sidley appears to be: "until PTI has obtained alternative services for the Services".  It seems to me that in some circumstances it would be inappropriate for PTI to be responsible for obtaining alternative services.  I agree that further discussion is needed on this.

Schedule A Services
I sent proposed comments from DT-O to the IOTF list today.

Hope this is helpful.  Please let me know if you have any questions.


From: iotf-bounces at icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 7:30 AM
To: 'Yuko Green'; iotf at icann.org
Subject: Re: [IOTF] Schedule A of the ICANN-PTI Services Agreement


Thank-you for this. From the subsequent email chain, I see that there has been discussion of various points including possible input from DT-O.

I have been through Sidley's issue list and inserted a series of possible CWG comments (attached). It would be helpful to understand if that issues list is still as it was on 18 August or if more recent work has moved it on.
Assuming it is as it was on 18 August, then I propose that my list of responses be utilised as a strawman for the CWG responses. However, if it has move on and many of the issues are now resolved and closed, it will be helpful to know that and to possibly see a revised / shorter issues list.


From: Yuko Green [mailto:yuko.green at icann.org]
Sent: 18 August 2016 09:05
To: iotf at icann.org<mailto:iotf at icann.org>
Subject: [IOTF] Schedule A of the ICANN-PTI Services Agreement

Dear IOTF members,

During today's CWG meeting #88 (18 August at 06:00 UTC), it was requested by CWG and Sidley that IOTF review the Schedule A of the attached ICANN-PTI Services Agreement. As such, I am sending you the Services Agreement as well as Sidley's notes about the Agreement.

Today's CWG call recording where the request was made can be found here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p6fvs9tegl2/<https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p6fvs9tegl2/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=2edd84f04d82a2e5c09303a5a3afb38728cb286cf510c1fcd31bc41c7abd6969>

Please also note that the intention is to re-discuss this Services Agreement during the next CWG call on 25 August at 14:00 UTC.


Yuko Green
Strategic Programs Manager
Global Domains Division
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Direct Line:  +1 310 578 8693
Mobile: +1 310 745 1517
E-mail:  yuko.green at icann.org<mailto:yuko.green at icann.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iotf/attachments/20160824/66727fa2/attachment.html>

More information about the IOTF mailing list