[IOTF] IOTF Call #2 - Meeting Notes (25 March 2016 @ 14:00 UTC)

Yuko Green yuko.green at icann.org
Fri Mar 25 16:51:12 UTC 2016


Dear members of the IOTF,

 

Please see below the meeting notes from today's IOTF call. The presentation
material and AC room recordings are now posted at
https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation under "Meetings & Work
Sessions" section. Please note, as a result of the connectivity issues
between AdobeConnect and phone bridge we experienced today, the audio was
not recorded in either AC room or phone bridge. The issue is now resolved
and will not affect the future calls.

 

*****

 

IOTF Call #2

25 March 2016 @ 14:00 UTC

 

Please note that this meeting is being recorded. 

 

If you would like to review the last call(s), the recordings and
presentation materials are posted publicly here:
https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation

 

Agenda:

1. Opening Remarks (Lise)

2. Implementation Items (Trang)

PTI Structure

CSC Charter

3. AOB

4. Closing Remarks (Lise)

 

 

Notes:

Recording started 8 minutes in as the meeting started late due to audio
issue in AC room. Audio is only available via phone bridge.

 

PTI Structure

 

Russ H in chat "Every place the figure says "IAOC" should say "IAB""

 

Moving all 3 functions:

Multiple contracts between PTI and ICANN due to different SLA, complaint
mechanism, escalation processes.

 

Numbers and protocols services will be sub-contracted to PTI as they will
continue to have contracts with ICANN.

 

If intent of the proposal is to cause minimum change to maintain the
operational stability, then this shows the extent of changes between moving
names only or 3 functions.

 

Consensus of the community was to move all 3 functions after extensive
discussions among operational communities. The proposal is clear that all 3
functions should move to PTI.

 

Contracts and oversight should be separated as it's up to ICANN how it
handles the sub-contracts with PTI.

 

Proposal's intent was to make PTI to host the whole IANA department and that
will mean minimum change

 

Splitting the IANA department may cost more

 

Operational security and stability should be the most important thing and
moving all 3 functions will achieve that. Administrative hardship should be
secondary concern.

 

It is clear from the comments that the intent of proposal is to move all 3
functions.

 

Moving all 3 functions may cause separation more complexed.

 

Proposal is unclear about separation because we don't know what will cause
the separation or remedies would be.

 

IFR is the one who will recommend separation but IFR is Names oriented. But
other communities have comparable methods to trigger separation.

 

IFR is not the separation mechanism, but SCWG is.

 

Implementation plan of moving all 3 functions into PTI needs to be presented
to the whole CWG but we need to solve the other portions of the PTI matter,
such as moving the staff into PTI. We need ICANN legal's memo to discuss
that and come to decision.

 

CSC Charter

The list has been previously shared with Donna Austin, the lead of the DT-C,
but she's unable to join the call to share her thought today.

 

1. Is ccNSO/GNSO approval on whole composition one-time only or ongoing?

Donna's understanding was that there is no approval by ccNSO/GNSO in case of
reappointment due to recall. However, any reappointment due to term
expiration would require ccNSO/GNSO approval.

 

ccNSO/GNSO should have the ability to question the reappointment for recall,
but not need to approve.

 

--> Bring it up to CWG for discussion

 

2. Required skill sets of the CSC members

Need to provide the specific skill sets to the appointing ACs/SOs so they
may appoint the members/liaisons appropriately and ccNSO/GNSO can approve
accordingly.

 

ICANN staff is requested to draft a first cut on skill set requirements

 

Any additional clarification we gain from this discussion will resides in
operational procedure documents or something instead of changing the charter
itself.

 

Instead of IOTF, ICANN should perhaps approach OCs to define the skill set
requirements.

 

ICANN staff to draft the first requirements but then bring to the OCs before
finalizing.

 

AOB

28 March Monday is public holiday for most people so no call will be held 

 

Next meeting to be held on 30 March Wednesday

 

Doodle Poll to be sent out for Wed 1900 UTC

 

Action Items:

1. ICANN staff to draft the first requirements for CSC membership skill sets
but then bring to the OCs before finalizing.

 

 

Yuko Green

Strategic Programs Manager

Global Domains Division

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

 

Direct Line:  +1 310 578 8693

Mobile: +1 310 745 1517

E-mail:   <mailto:yuko.green at icann.org> yuko.green at icann.org

 <http://www.icann.org/> www.icann.org

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iotf/attachments/20160325/9281098b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5096 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iotf/attachments/20160325/9281098b/smime-0001.p7s>


More information about the IOTF mailing list