<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Hi Paul,</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><br>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">You had raised the below topic for discussion in the AOB portion of the agenda on Wednesday’s IOTF call. Because we ran out of time, I had suggested that we pick up this discussion in the IOTF
mail list. Below is what you raised on the call:</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><br>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">"I've raised this a number of times on the list. Historically there has always been a difference of the way in which ccs and gTLD are handled or respected within the IANA frame work and obviously
the post transition we want the difference to continue. I don’t know what juncture it needs to be captured, whether it’s in the Bylaws of PTI, whether it’s implementation recognition in the document, implementation documentation. And I would welcome your guidance,
as to how you intend to respect the differences between the authority parts for ccTLDs and gTLDs.”</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><br>
</div>
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif">Could you please point to the part in the ICG, CWG or CCWG proposal that speak to any requirements for implementation on this topic?</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif">Thank you,</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif">Trang</font></div>
<br>
</body>
</html>