<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:1464543378;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-696378410 1163532346 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
margin-left:.75in;
text-indent:-.5in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:1888641433;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-882474950 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l1:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Dear members of the IOTF,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Please see below the meeting notes and chat history from today’s IOTF call. The presentation material is now posted at <a href="https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation">https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation</a> under “Meetings & Work Sessions” section. The audio recording and transcript will be made available within the next few days. Unfortunately due to technical issue, the AdobeConnect room recording was not completed though the recording was started at the beginning of the call. We are working with IT to identify the issue to avoid this from happening on the future calls. My apology for this inconvenience.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>***Meeting Notes***<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='color:#5B9BD5'>Implementation Oversight Task Force (ITOF) call #6<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='color:#5B9BD5'>20 April 2016 @ 19:00 UTC<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Please note that this meeting is being recorded. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>To mute or Unmute, select *6 (Star-Six)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>If you would like to review the last call(s), the recordings and presentation materials are posted publicly here: https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><u>Agenda:<o:p></o:p></u></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>1.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span><![endif]>Opening Remarks<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>2.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span><![endif]>Implementation Items<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.25in;text-indent:.5in'>PTI Formation Document Review process<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-left:.25in;text-indent:.5in'>IANA Escalation Mechanisms<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>3.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span><![endif]>AOB<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-left:.25in;text-indent:.5in'>Paul Kane’s question<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-left:.25in;text-indent:.5in'>RZMA question<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>4.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span><![endif]>Closing Remarks<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><u>Notes:<o:p></o:p></u></b></p><p class=MsoNormal>PTI Formation documents are:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Bylaws<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Articles of Incorporation<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Conflict of Interest Policy<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><u>Action Items:<o:p></o:p></u></b></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Share Document Review Process & Timeline slide with Client Committee to discuss their involvement and Sidley's. (ICANN)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Share PTI formation documents term sheets with Client Committee (and potentially with Sidley). (ICANN)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- IANA CS Complaint Resolution Process - is the CEO step no longer part of the process? Chuck will look into the question raised and get back to this group via the email list. (Chuck Gomes)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- IANA Problem Resolution Process - Annex J - Flowchart 1 and 3 have the same title but one swimlane different. Chuck will look into it and get back to this group via the email list. (Chuck Gomes)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Section 7 & 8 of annex C: could be included in the ICANN Bylaws, PTI bylaws or in the ICANN-PTI contract. ICANN to flag this item with lawyers to make sure it gets included. (ICANN)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Share the rough timeline of implementation item documents during the next call (ICANN)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Review the ICANN Bylaws for the mentioning of the ICANN-PTI contract (ICANN)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>***Chat History***<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: Will we have audio in the AC room for the call?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: Yup can hear <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Lise Fuhr: Good evening<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Chuck Gomes: I am 3200.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Allan MacGillivray: Tht's me at 5335<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: To be clear there will there be PTI Bylaws as it is a seperate affilaite company<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: ?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Alissa Cooper: What section of the bylaws will the PTI Purpose be drawn from?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Jonathan Robinson: Apologeis for late arrival<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Jonathan Robinson: Had a minor IT glitch<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Nathalie Vergnolle: Yes, there will be separate PTI bylaws<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Thanks Nathalie<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Yuko Green: @Alissa, that would be are covered in Section 16.2 and Annex D (Articles 1 &2).<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Lise Fuhr: Thank you Trang<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Yuko Green: @Alissa, the language was circulated via IOTF mail on 15 April<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Alissa Cooper: ok, thanks, will find it<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: + 1 Paul on PTI bylaws<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Agree Trang<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: This group is here to help you get it right then it needs ratification by the groups CWG/SO etc<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: agree bylaws and AoI should go to Sidley<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: + 1 Chuck<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Chuck agree<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Greg Shatan: With my clilent committee hat on, I'm happy to step in to the review at that point, suggeted by Chuck.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): agree totally Jonathan<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Jonathan Robinson: Reminder of the role of client committee. Not a committee to take decisions but to facilitate effective interaction with the lawyers to ensure that we use them efficiently / cost-effectively.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Lise Fuhr: @Jonathan agree<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Avri Doria: wasn't this the CSC group. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: seems unusual that it would go to GDD<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: Agree Matt<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Donna Austin, Neustar: @Avri, wasn't what the CSC group?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: PTYI BOard is not on the escalation path in the slide<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): hmmm<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: PTI Board would come after the IANA functions manager as the IANA functions manager is on the PTI Board if I recall correctly<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): that resonates Matthrw<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Donna Austin, Neustar: This is for individual complaints<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Jonathan Robinson: What does the reference CWG 1367 mean?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: How long wil this take? If there is a problem there needs to be a quick fix .....<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Avri Doria: i guess i am missing the problem here. this seems to accurately reflect stage 1.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Avri Doria: i do not think it was an omission<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: Its actually para 367 in our proosal Johnathan<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: *proposal<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Avri Doria: 1367<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): the proposed <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Yuko Green: 1367 refers to the paragraph number from ICG proposal<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Jonathan Robinson: Thanks Yuko. I was looking for the reference in the original CWG proposal<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: If this is for individuals the proposed escalation path on the screen makes sense<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: (not the current one)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Today there is GDD - but tomorrow there will be PTI Board<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Yuko Green: @jonathan, that would be paragraph 367 from CWG proposal<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Jonathan Robinson: Thank-you Yukp<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): yes Avri thus the *proposed*<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Alan Greenberg: I have no problem with the ICANN CEO being removed. Was just curious that it was there today.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Agree Avri .... no longer there<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Donna Austin, Neustar: @Alan - I think it is at the complainant's discretion to take their complaint to the ICANN President & CEO, something anyone can do, not just as it relates to IANA<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): THX Chuck <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: + 1 Avri and + 1 Paul on speed and efficiency<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): agree Donna<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Donna - redelegation will (likely) be settled in Court - but technical operations need to involve The Managemnt of PTI- ie the Board<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Avri Doria: agree with Donna and that is a reasonable option<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: Yes for emercengy technical issues there is the 24x7 escalation process<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Avri Doria: i think the right hand table corresponds to what we included in the plan.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: +1 Avri<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): YUP <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Donna Austin, Neustar: I think the short answer to Trang's quesiton is there was no oversight.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): I will say again *the proposal*<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Allan MacGillivray: +1 Jonathan on agreeing to the current CWG proposal (right hand chart) and moving on. The IANA Functions Manager can always discuss this with the CEO. So, let's move on.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Avri Doria: while the PRI may be a service provider to GDD, i did not think the IFPM would be a report of the GDD president except in so far as the GDD prez is on PTI board.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Avri Doria: ... PTI ...<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Avri Doria: they wanted to be sure there was no oversight. good due dillgence.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Donna Austin, Neustar: @Alan, it was an example<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Donna Austin, Neustar: a bad one, but just an example. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: ccTLD are not ICANN - they are local and IANA confirm local and report to ICANN <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Alan Greenberg: @Donna, yes, but one that I tdon't think is possible, so was curious if I was missing something.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Alan Greenberg: @Paul, yes, but ultimately IANA only takes action after action of the ICANN Board - today.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Alan Greenberg: ICANN Boardpresumably verifying that local issues meet RFC<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Donna Austin, Neustar: @Alan, I was looking for examples at short notice and used a bad one.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: ICANN verify that the ransfer is correct (ie Registrants have been safely transferred) - ie stability of the ccTLD users<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Secure and stability of the DNS .....<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): Alan reefer back nee to the FOI for Delegations lokking to both RFC 1591 and the GAC Priciples relsting to Delegations<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Alan Greenberg: @Donna :-)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Bylaws... makes most sense... Thanks<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: Para 264 for refernce<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Thanks Trang<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Donna Austin, Neustar: I have to drop from the call. thanks all<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Alissa Cooper: I have a different question to ask under AOB, if we have time<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Lise Fuhr: I have to leave at the top of the hour<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Note taker - It is ICANN Bylaws and also PTI bylaws<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>matthew shears: + 1 Alissa - both sets of bylaws are key<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Yuko Green: @Paul, thank you<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: THanks .... Yuko ( remove Either)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Thasnk<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Yuko Green: Thank you Paul<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: I dont think that the CCWG would provide much control over ICANNs ability to create and modify contracts<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Alissa Cooper: it is currently referenced in 1.1(d), but not for the effect that Chuck was describing<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: Unless the wording was places directly into the bylaws and not just a reference<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: +1 Paul<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: Yes that it being done in other areas<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Kane: Thanks all<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>James Gannon: thanks all<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Jonathan Robinson: Thank-you Trang<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): Thnks everyone...Bye<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Greg Shatan: Bye all!<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Yuko Green<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Strategic Programs Manager<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Global Domains Division<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Mobile: +1 310 745 1517<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>E-mail: <a href="mailto:yuko.green@icann.org"><span style='color:blue'>yuko.green@icann.org</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><a href="http://www.icann.org/"><span style='color:blue'>www.icann.org</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>