<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">in that case, one would have to be careful to ensure that the PTI Bylaws do not drift into the fundamental bylaws.<div><br></div><div>CW</div><div><br><div><div>On 16 Jun 2016, at 08:27, James Gannon <<a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net">james@cyberinvasion.net</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">
<div>
<div>
<div>Ah now I understand. </div>
<div>I would think the issue of what would happen during a separation and what that would look like would be dealt with at the time through the WG mechanisms we have designed, as there are a number of potential separation scenarios, not all of which require
PTI to be spun off as an ongoing concern.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Also just to be clear there is no non-voting liaisons to the PTI board that I am aware of.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-JG</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div id="MAC_OUTLOOK_SIGNATURE"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt; text-align: left; border-width: 1pt medium medium; border-style: solid none none; padding: 3pt 0in 0in; border-top-color: rgb(181, 196, 223); ">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Christopher Wilkinson <<a href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Thursday 16 June 2016 at 06:37<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>James Gannon <<a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net">james@cyberinvasion.net</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>>, "<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:iotf@icann.org">iotf@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:iotf@icann.org">iotf@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated draft of responses in PTI Bylaws-AoI table<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
No. As long as there is no separation, the existing non-voting liaisons are enough.
<div>In the event of separation, there will obviously be a demand from GAC for equivalent influence.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>After all, one of the primary motives in creating the GAC in the first place (1998) was IANA and its relationship with ccTLDs.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>CW</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On 16 Jun 2016, at 07:25, James Gannon <<a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net">james@cyberinvasion.net</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">
<div>
<div>
<div>I don’t understand your point Christopher, are you saying that there should be reps from the Acs on the PTI board?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-JG</div>
<div>
<div id=""></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt; text-align: left; border-width: 1pt medium medium; border-style: solid none none; padding: 3pt 0in 0in; border-top-color: rgb(181, 196, 223); ">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Christopher Wilkinson <<a href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Thursday 16 June 2016 at 01:12<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>"<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>>, "<a href="mailto:iotf@icann.org">iotf@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:iotf@icann.org">iotf@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated draft of responses in PTI Bylaws-AoI table<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
Good evening:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regarding the PTI Bylaws document please note the following:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>Section 6.6 Advisory Committees</b></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>PTI Board will not need Advisory Committees as long as it is an integral part of ICANN.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>in the event of separation, PTI Board will require GAC and ALAC Advisory Committees.</div>
<div>In that event, it is likely that PTI will also require SSAC and RSSAC Advisory Committees.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>Section 7.1 - Officers</b></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>N.B. The text refers to Officers. The comment refers to Offices.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>CW</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On 15 Jun 2016, at 23:16, Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite"><span><PTIBylaws-AoI_clean_15June.pdf></span></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>