[IPC-GNSO] Vice chair

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Thu Oct 22 07:37:56 UTC 2015


Yes, an interim vice chair is a reasonable and pragmatic approach.  We will
need to develop a position across the house quite quickly.

Greg

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Lori Schulman <lschulman at inta.org> wrote:

> My thoughts are to elect our vice chair now until the chair issue is
> resolved.
>
> Lori S. Schulman
> Senior Director, Internet Policy
> INTA
> 202-261-6588
> ------------------------------
> From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> Sent: ‎10/‎22/‎2015 3:29 AM
> To: McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady at winston.com>
> Cc: IPC-GNSO <ipc-gnso at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [IPC-GNSO] Vice chair
>
> From my late night read of the GNSO Procedure and the ICANN Bylaws, this
> is not expressly stated.  It merely says there are two vice chairs, one
> from each house, with terms of no more than one year (but no term limits
> are stated, other than those that apply to them as Councilors).
>
> There is no provision for the current situation.  There is no "hold over"
> concept as there is with Board seats, where the sitting Board continues
> until replaced, if not replaced at the end of the term.
>
> As a governance matter, the GNSO Council is likely better off with two
> vice-chairs, but it can certainly function for a limited period of time
> with one.
>
> We are in uncharted territory.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:33 AM, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady at winston.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Not sure. Contracted parties reappointed Volker (for now). So I guess he
>> can run things alone in the absence of a second vice chair until a suitable
>> Chair is negotiated.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Metalitz, Steven <met at msk.com<mailto:
>> met at msk.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Do we need one (for right now)?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent with Good (www.good.com<http://www.good.com>)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: McGrady, Paul D. [PMcGrady at winston.com<mailto:PMcGrady at winston.com
>> >]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
>> To: IPC-GNSO
>> Subject: [IPC-GNSO] Vice chair
>>
>> IPC Leadership:
>>
>> What's the plan for our (interim?) vice chair? No doubt it will come up
>> in today's wrap up session.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential.
>> Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it
>> without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive
>> any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without
>> the permission of the author.
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPC-GNSO mailing list
>> IPC-GNSO at icann.org<mailto:IPC-GNSO at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso
>> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential.
>> Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it
>> without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive
>> any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without
>> the permission of the author.
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPC-GNSO mailing list
>> IPC-GNSO at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ipc-gnso/attachments/20151022/bf0b80fa/attachment.html>


More information about the IPC-GNSO mailing list