<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div><span></span></div>
<div>
<div>Hi Guys</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Just getting back to NYC after a visit to ICANN LA HQ. Happy meetings with many. Thanks to Chantelle for arranging it. </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">See you all in Johannesburg.</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
<div>Best</div>
Aslam G Mohamed
<div>RNA IP Attorneys India <br>
<div>
<div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: 13pt;">US +1 646 243 9857</span></div>
</div>
<div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: 13pt;">HQ +91 124 2841222</span></div>
</div>
<div><img src="cid:9465C527-B622-4C5A-A8BB-44E5A53B33E5" alt="image1.jpeg" id="9465C527-B622-4C5A-A8BB-44E5A53B33E5"></div>
</div>
<div><br>
On 26-May-2017, at 05:09, Jannik Skou <<a href="mailto:js@thomsentrampedach.com">js@thomsentrampedach.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>Hi Brian</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Back from INTA Barcelona - I see your email with the idea for a call Tuesday/Wed.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Did you guys have a call? (Sorry for missing out on that). was a hectic week as always during INTA.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>I see there a comments posted by INTA/BRG/BC</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-subsequent-procedures-22mar17/2017-May/thread.html">https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-subsequent-procedures-22mar17/2017-May/thread.html</a></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Kind regards | Mit freundlichem Gruss,</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Jannik Skou, MBA</span><br>
<span>Partner</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Thomsen Trampedach GmbH</span><br>
<span>Grundstrasse 22a</span><br>
<span>6343 Rotkreuz</span><br>
<span>Switzerland</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>T +45.22275696</span><br>
<span>M <a href="mailto:js@thomsentrampedach.com">js@thomsentrampedach.com</a></span><br>
<span>W <a href="http://thomsentrampedach.com">http://thomsentrampedach.com</a></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On 19 May 2017, at 23:14, Brian Scarpelli <<a href="mailto:BScarpelli@actonline.org">BScarpelli@actonline.org</a>> wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Dear IPC colleagues – apologies in advance for sending on a Friday afternoon but just a quick update/request re: IPC comments on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG’s ‘Community Comment 2’ (background document and specific
questions both attached), due on May 22. [I have attached the CC2 docs, and the IPC comments on CC1 are accessible at:
<a href="http://bit.ly/2q53diK">http://bit.ly/2q53diK</a>]</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>We have not been able to get a draft comment together for IPC review yet and because of the approaching May 22 deadline would like to renew our request for volunteers to help us potentially put something together quickly on critical
IPC issues. Would any further IPC members be able to help out with this? Also I have checked w Greg and we should be good to have our comments accepted if they are a little late (this is not a formal ICANN comment also).</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>If it can help, we could hold a call if needed, so I created a quick doodle poll for next Tues and Wed afternoons:
<a href="http://doodle.com/poll/cu5daq9f8wfzvgkt">http://doodle.com/poll/cu5daq9f8wfzvgkt</a>. If anyone wants to help out and can indicate times that work for them we can have a call to put our heads together on this comment during this call?</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>-Brian</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>From: Jannik Skou [<a href="mailto:js@thomsentrampedach.com">mailto:js@thomsentrampedach.com</a>]
</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 7:54 AM</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>To: Brian Scarpelli <<a href="mailto:BScarpelli@actonline.org">BScarpelli@actonline.org</a>></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Cc: Mike Rodenbaugh <<a href="mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com">mike@rodenbaugh.com</a>>; Kiran Malancharuvil <<a href="mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com">Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com</a>>; Ariel Manoff <<a href="mailto:amanoff@vmf.com.ar">amanoff@vmf.com.ar</a>>;
Aslam Mohamed <<a href="mailto:aslam@rnaip.com">aslam@rnaip.com</a>>; Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>>; Chantelle Doerksen (<a href="mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org">chantelle.doerksen@icann.org</a>) <<a href="mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org">chantelle.doerksen@icann.org</a>>;
<a href="mailto:listserv@ipconstituency.org">listserv@ipconstituency.org</a></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Subject: Re: [IPC Discussion List] Drafting IPC Comments re: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment Request (due May 1)</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Hi Brian, Mike, Kiran, Paul, Hector and Aslam </span>
<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Please find attached my own comments already submitted.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Your spread sheet makes sense.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>It seems very likely that the deadline will be extended to May 22nd. (see email from Jeff today) as the GAC has requested more time, as I understood it.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I would suggest we organise a short call to discuss how we best put the comments together.
</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Also maybe we could meet during GDD in Madrid and then discuss any points we seem to disagree on? (Provided the deadline is extended of course).</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I suggest a native US/UK member take the lead (also) on drafting final text :-)</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Kind regards | Mit freundlichem Gruss,</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Jannik Skou, MBA</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Partner</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Thomsen Trampedach GmbH</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Grundstrasse 22a</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>6343 Rotkreuz</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Switzerland</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>T +45.22275696</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>M <a href="mailto:js@thomsentrampedach.com">js@thomsentrampedach.com</a></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>W <a href="http://thomsentrampedach.com">http://thomsentrampedach.com</a></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On 18 Apr 2017, at 13:14, Brian Scarpelli <<a href="mailto:BScarpelli@actonline.org">BScarpelli@actonline.org</a>> wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>(copying entire IPC in case we have additional volunteers)</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Dear Mike, Jannik, Paul, Kiran, Héctor & Aslam – thanks very much for volunteering to help with IPC input on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG’s ‘Community Comment 2’ (background document and specific questions both attached).
This comment is due May 1. </span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I have created a pretty basic shared spreadsheet that we can use to organize input if that is helpful:<a href="http://bit.ly/2pM6FPN">http://bit.ly/2pM6FPN</a>. Would anyone be interested in taking the lead in drafting for this
comment? If I could help us get a call together I’m happy to do that.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>If it is helpful here’s a link to the IPC’s comments from August last year re: ‘Community Comment 1’:</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>· IPC Response to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group’s First Request for Community Comments (19 August 2016)</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Lastly, for anyone who wants to take a look at the different comment opportunities for the IPC that we’ve been tracking, filed on, or are considering filing on, please visit:
<a href="http://bit.ly/2oBY18z">http://bit.ly/2oBY18z</a></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>-Brian</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Brian Scarpelli</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Senior Policy Counsel</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>517-507-1446 | <a href="mailto:bscarpelli@actonline.org">
bscarpelli@actonline.org</a></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>ACT | The App Association</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>From: <a href="mailto:listserv@ipconstituency.simplelists.com">
listserv@ipconstituency.simplelists.com</a> [<a href="mailto:listserv@ipconstituency.simplelists.com">mailto:listserv@ipconstituency.simplelists.com</a>] On Behalf Of Brian Scarpelli</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:37 AM</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>To: <a href="mailto:listserv@ipconstituency.org">listserv@ipconstituency.org</a></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Cc: Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>>; Chantelle Doerksen (<a href="mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org">chantelle.doerksen@icann.org</a>) <<a href="mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org">chantelle.doerksen@icann.org</a>></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Subject: [IPC Discussion List] Request for Volunteers -- New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment Request (due May 1)</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>IPC colleagues –</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>The leadership team of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG is seeking community input through Community Comment 2, with comments requested by May 1. Please see attached for (1) a backgrounder and survey of subjects comments
are requested on, and (2) specific questions the PDP WG is seeking responses to [both PDF and Word]. I plan to circulate a template for gathering our input soon.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>This survey is extensive and the IPC may only wish to provide answers to certain questions that relate to its own particular interests or concerns. Please let myself and Chantelle know if you are interested in helping with an IPC
response to this survey.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Brian</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Brian Scarpelli</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Senior Policy Counsel</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>517-507-1446 | <a href="mailto:bscarpelli@actonline.org">
bscarpelli@actonline.org</a></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>ACT | The App Association</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span><Community Comment 2 letter_IPC_20 March 2017.pdf><New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment 2.pdf></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span><Community Comment 2 letter_IPC_20 March 2017.pdf><New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment 2.pdf></span><br>
</blockquote>
<span></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<hr>
<font face="Verdana" color="Gray" size="1">IMPORTANT NOTICE - The contents of this email and attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. Copying or communicating any part of it to others is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are
not the intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or rely on this email and should please return it immediately or notify us by telephone. While we take every reasonable precaution to screen out computer viruses from emails, attachments to this
email may contain such viruses. We cannot accept liability for loss or damage resulting from such viruses. The integrity of email across the Internet cannot be guaranteed and RNA will not accept liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this
medium for transmissions by or to RNA.<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>