[ispcp] Revised statement on Registry Services

[Maggie Mansourkia]

Tony and all-
I'm sorry my schedule conflict did not allow me to stay on the call long
enough to discuss the registry services issue.  I think the draft response
is well done and some of my edits clarify and underscore the points
previously made.  However, I draw everyone's attention to the very last
sentence under the "quick look" section, b/c the MCI position goes beyond
the previous statement of concern.  I share the recommendations raised in
Tony's draft and don't see quick look as a pragmatic solution until they are
addressed. I'm happy to discuss if others disagree.
Thanks and have a good weekend.
Maggie



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org]On
Behalf Of tony.ar.holmes at bt.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 8:28 AM
To: ispcp at icann.org
Subject: [ispcp] Revised statement on Registry Services


Attached is a revised draft ISPCP statement on Registry Services.
 
The change reflects the debate on the Registry PDP that took place during
the last GNSO call. The Business Constituency had proposed changes to the
ToRs for the Registry Services PDP. As a Consituency the ISPCP have yet to
discuss that particular issue, however we did offer support for a proposal
that came from the GNSO Chair. It was proposed that any significant issues
identified during the process should be logged and considered later. The
proposed text addresses that point.
 
I suggest we consider this during this evenings call. For those who cannot
make the call, pleases submit comments by mail before the end of this week.
 
Regards
Tony
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 50543 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20040130/81c18bf8/winmail.dat>