[ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration

[MARUYAMA Naomasa]

Dear Oliver,

>Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:48:13 +0200
>From: <olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com>

>Regarding the comments coming from JPNIC, I do not agree that  "SRSU is out of scope of the current New gTLD process".
>I do not understand that Recommendation 1(p.19), Recommendations 16 and 19(p.21), in the GNSO report to the Board  "Introduction of New  Generic Top-Level Domains", exclude single registrant TLDs, and all debates since then prove the contrary.

In response to your point above, I have to say that our point is:

GNSO discussion before the GNSO report did not include single
                ^^^^^^                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
registrant TLDs, so that another policy process should be initiated in
order to address this issue.

This is completely different from your view point.  I think this kind
of major modification, or new interpretation of the recommendation
afterward is a breach of process.  I also would like to point out that
Board resolutions 2010.03.12.17 and 2010.03.12.18 in Nairobi for
vertical integration/separation issue have same logical structure as
our point.  Actual meaning of these resolutions are:

  Vertical integration/separation issue is not included in the GNSO
final report, so that another PDP should give an answer for that.

Regards,

Masa.

----
(Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)