Fw: [ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration

[Anthony Harris]

Dear colleagues,

I have noted comments from Masa and Olivier.

Tomorrow the ICANN comments deadline is up for this
report. I attach an amended draft text for our reply, which
attempts to accomodate all viewpoints. (See changes in
red)

If this is unsatisfactory, please advise asap.

Kind regards

Tony Harris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MARUYAMA Naomasa" <maruyama at nic.ad.jp>
To: <olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com>
Cc: <harris at cabase.org.ar>; <ispcp at icann.org>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration


>
> Dear Oliver,
>
>>Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:48:13 +0200
>>From: <olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com>
>
>>Regarding the comments coming from JPNIC, I do not agree that  "SRSU is 
>>out of scope of the current New gTLD process".
>>I do not understand that Recommendation 1(p.19), Recommendations 16 and 
>>19(p.21), in the GNSO report to the Board  "Introduction of New  Generic 
>>Top-Level Domains", exclude single registrant TLDs, and all debates since 
>>then prove the contrary.
>
> In response to your point above, I have to say that our point is:
>
> GNSO discussion before the GNSO report did not include single
>                ^^^^^^                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> registrant TLDs, so that another policy process should be initiated in
> order to address this issue.
>
> This is completely different from your view point.  I think this kind
> of major modification, or new interpretation of the recommendation
> afterward is a breach of process.  I also would like to point out that
> Board resolutions 2010.03.12.17 and 2010.03.12.18 in Nairobi for
> vertical integration/separation issue have same logical structure as
> our point.  Actual meaning of these resolutions are:
>
>  Vertical integration/separation issue is not included in the GNSO
> final report, so that another PDP should give an answer for that.
>
> Regards,
>
> Masa.
>
> ----
> (Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama
> Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: AAA-ISPCP response to call for comments on VI Initial Report.V.2.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 24064 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20100810/3ca446fb/AAA-ISPCPresponsetocallforcommentsonVIInitialReport.V.2.doc>