[ispcp] WG: Support for RAP Motion at the Sep 22 council meeting

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

I think we could support the motion - unless any ISPCP member having
Ry/Rr interests is against

*	"requesting an issues report to evauate whether a minimum
baseline of registration abuse provisions should be created for all in
scope ICANN agreements".

 
Strong opposition from the contracted parties house can be expected.
 
Any comments?
 

Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich

 


 
 
 ----- Original Message ----- 

	From: Deutsch, Sarah B <mailto:sarah.b.deutsch at verizon.com>  
	To: wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de 
	Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:46 PM
	Subject: Support for RAP Motion

	Dear Wolf-Ulrich:
	 
	
	On today's BC call, members asked if we could count on the
ISCP's support for Zahid's motion to address the remaining registration
abuse policies (#5 attached), especially with respect to uniformity of
contracts.  
	 
	
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+Septe
mber+2011
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+Sept
ember+2011> 

	Would you all be in position to support this?
	
	Thanks and best,
	 
	
	Sarah
	 


	Sarah B. Deutsch 
	Vice President & Associate General Counsel 
	Verizon Communications 
	Phone: 703-351-3044 
	Fax: 703-351-3670 
	

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20110918/8fdc3832/attachment.html>