[ispcp] AW: AW: Motion to Address Whois Access

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

1. Rrs are requested to provide more reliable WhoIs service. In order to achieve this they may have to improve their operations and to invest money.

2. NCSG members may have reservations against an "enforceable" way to access WhoIs.



Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich



________________________________
Von: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met at msk.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 28. April 2012 21:46
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: marilynscade at hotmail.com; evansj at yahoo-inc.com; bwinterfeldt at steptoe.com; David.Taylor at hoganlovells.com; john at crediblecontext.com; zahid at dndrc.com; cdigangi at inta.org; tonyarholmes at btinternet.com; harris at cabase.org.ar; onovoa at antel.com.uy; excomm at bizconst.org; ispcp at icann.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Motion to Address Whois Access

I don't see any problem but can you explain why opposition is expected ?

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 28, 2012, at 10:47 AM, "KnobenW at telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW at telekom.de>" <KnobenW at telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW at telekom.de>> wrote:

Friendly reminder


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich


_____________________________________________
Von:     Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Gesendet:       Mittwoch, 25. April 2012 12:03
An:     'Marilyn Cade'; Steve Metalitz; J.Scott Evans; Brian Winterfeldt; David Taylor; 'john at crediblecontext.com<mailto:john at crediblecontext.com>'; Zahid Jamil; cdigangi at inta.org<mailto:cdigangi at inta.org>; Tony Holmes; harris at cabase.org.ar<mailto:harris at cabase.org.ar>; Novoa, Osvaldo; excomm at bizconst.org<mailto:excomm at bizconst.org>; ISPCP
Betreff:        Motion to Address Whois Access

Dear CSG colleagues,

following a discussion within the ISP constituency on Whois Access I would appreciate your comments on a related draft motion to be brought before the GNSO council (see attached).

Background is that I've grounded a council consent agenda item some weeks ago which was intended not to address furthermore Whois access as recommended by the RAP WG. The draft motion is to be seen as a proposal on how to cover this item in future. The RAA PDP seems to be the right environent for this since the issue of access is certainly one of the issues addressed in the RAA Final Issue Report.

As we're expecting opposition from the CPH as well as the NCSG - based on different rationales - ideas regarding socializing and timing are also welcome.
< Datei: Motion to Address Whois Access - 24 April 2012.doc >>


Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20120430/90d13a8e/attachment.html>