[ispcp] [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council

[Mike O'Connor]

as do i.

mikey


On Feb 14, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de wrote:

> 
> I do as well.
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:22:28 +0100
> Subject: RE: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested
> communication from council
> From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa at Antel.com.uy>
> To: "'Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de'" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de>,
> "ispcp at icann.org" <ispcp at icann.org>
> 
> I, personally, support sending this letter as written.
> Best regards,
> Osvaldo
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org] En
> nombre de Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de
> Enviado el: Jueves, 14 de Febrero de 2013 10:10
> Para: ispcp at icann.org
> Asunto: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested
> communication from council
> 
> I'd like to put a short discussion about the letter annexed to the
> agenda today.
> 
> Clearly BC and IPC are against sending this letter. There shall be a
> last try to find a conclusion about. Fadi's deadline is end of Feb.
> 
> We should settle our position.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:47 +0100
> Subject: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from
> council
> From: Mason Cole <mcole at 5x5com.com>
> To: "council at gnso.icann.org List" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> 
> Council colleagues --
> 
> As you know, Fadi requested of the council its input regarding the
> strawman proposal resulting from the BC's and IPC's request for
> additional RPMs in new gTLDs.  On December 27, I circulated an early
> draft of a council reply.
> 
> The communication is due very shortly, and has been taken up by a small
> group within the council to ensure that all points of view are
> represented.  Because this is an agenda item for our meeting this week,
> at Maria Farrell's helpful suggestion, I'm sending the current draft to
> council so we can be prepared to discuss it then.  This draft does not
> reflect additional input of the BC and IPC -- if this is provided prior
> to the meeting, I'll be happy to forward it to the council.
> 
> Thanks --
> 
> Mason
> 
> 
> 
> El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido
> únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede
> ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor
> notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine
> inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su
> sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este
> e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas
> destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con
> respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo
> nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
> 
> 
> This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely
> for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform
> the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as
> the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any
> person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited.
> ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without
> respecting our Information Security Policy.
> 
> 
> 


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20130214/4288577a/smime.p7s>