[ispcp] public comment on the Thick Whois Initial Report

[Tony Holmes]

Hi Mikey

That approach still sounds a winner to me, we certainly need to add some
weigh to the cause here. After years of bleating about the lack of thick
WHOIS it would be remiss of us not to comment.

Tony

 

From: owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org] On
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: 24 July 2013 17:15
To: <ispcp at icann.org>
Subject: [ispcp] public comment on the Thick Whois Initial Report

 

 

hi all,

 

the initial comment period for the Thick Whois Initial Report is closed, but
the reply-comment period is still open and will close on 4-Aug (slightly
weird, since that is a Sunday).  

 

i would be willing to go with either a simple email that states that we
support the conclusion to require thick Whois across all gTLD registries
(pretty much mirroring the ALAC), or draft up a longer version.  i'm leaning
toward the short statement of support in this one.  is anybody uncomfortable
with that?

 

here's the link to the public comment page

 

 
https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/thick-whois-initial-21jun13-en.
htm

 

mikey

 


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20130724/0d91a76a/attachment.html>