<html>
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:sans-serif;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:#606420;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{margin-right:0cm;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
tt
{font-family:"Courier New";}
span.EmailStyle19
{font-family:Arial;
color:blue;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
@page Section1
{size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink="#606420">
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Maggie</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Improving the existing relationships is
indeed a continued goal, I think Mark’s remarks refer to new
relationships (currently outside of ICANN recognition). We need to clarify
this.</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>I have mixed views over the expansion of
the SSAC, although recognition that on some particular security aspects ISP
involvement would be helpful is potentially a good move.</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Regards</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Tony</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;color:blue'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original
Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b>
maggie.mansourkia@verizon.com [mailto:maggie.mansourkia@verizon.com] <br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> 14 July 2006 14:57<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> Holmes,AR,Tony,CXM R<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Cc:</span></b> greg_ruth@yahoo.com;
ispcp@icann.org; </span></font><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>mcfadden@21st-century-texts.com</span></font><font
size=2 face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>;
olivier.muron@orange-ft.com; owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org; yukari@nic.ad.jp<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> RE: [ispcp] ISPCP Draft
Comments on US Government ICANN MoU Inquiry</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'><br>
</span></font><font size=2 face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:sans-serif'>I hope to send comments soon. I did want to check
the group's pulse on the notion that no changes are necessary in the
relationships with other groups? It seems to me that ICANN could benefit
in working better (perhaps more formally?) with the IETF and other more
"grown up" type groups? And do we think a larger SSAC to
include ISP experts would be beneficial? </span></font> <br>
<br>
<font size=2 face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:sans-serif'>Magnolia
Mansourkia<br>
Chief Privacy Counsel<br>
Verizon Communications<br>
703-351-3199 Voice<br>
703-351-3653 Fax<br>
202-744-3745 Mobile</span></font> <br>
<br>
</p>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=3 cellpadding=0 width="100%"
style='width:100.0%;margin-left:36.0pt'>
<tr>
<td width="39%" valign=top style='width:39.98%;padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=1 face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:
7.5pt;font-family:sans-serif;font-weight:bold'>tony.ar.holmes@bt.com</span></font></b><font
size=1 face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:sans-serif'> </span></font><br>
<font size=1 face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:sans-serif'>Sent
by: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org</span></font> </p>
<p><font size=1 face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:
sans-serif'>07/14/2006 09:44 AM</span></font> </p>
</td>
<td width="58%" valign=top style='width:58.96%;padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=3 cellpadding=0 width="100%"
style='width:100.0%'>
<tr>
<td style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal align=right style='text-align:right'><font size=1
face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:sans-serif'>To</span></font></p>
</td>
<td valign=top style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=1 face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:
7.5pt;font-family:sans-serif'>greg_ruth@yahoo.com,
mcfadden@21st-century-texts.com, ispcp@icann.org,
olivier.muron@orange-ft.com, yukari@nic.ad.jp</span></font> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal align=right style='text-align:right'><font size=1
face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:sans-serif'>cc</span></font></p>
</td>
<td valign=top style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal align=right style='text-align:right'><font size=1
face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:sans-serif'>Subject</span></font></p>
</td>
<td valign=top style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=1 face=sans-serif><span style='font-size:
7.5pt;font-family:sans-serif'>RE: [ispcp] ISPCP Draft Comments on US
Government ICANN MoU Inquiry</span></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=3 cellpadding=0>
<tr>
<td valign=top style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</td>
<td valign=top style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p class=MsoNormal></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'><br>
<br>
<br>
</span></font><tt><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>Greg</span></font></tt><font
size=2 face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">I support your sentiments on the RS operations (I
also like 'tragic</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">attempt' but 'misguided' is far more diplomatic
though not so</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">explanatory, so suggest we make that change).</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">I hope more comments will be forthcoming from
others, or is Mark's draft</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">so good that it's supported in its totality? </font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">If so - great job Mark!</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Tony </font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">-----Original Message-----</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">From: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Behalf Of Greg Ruth</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Sent: 14 July 2006 14:35</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">To: mcfadden@21st-century-texts.com;
ispcp@icann.org;</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">olivier.muron@orange-ft.com; Yukari Takayama</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Subject: Re: [ispcp] ISPCP Draft Comments on US
Government ICANN MoU</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Inquiry</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Mark (et al),</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New"> I like your draft. We might replace
"tragic attempt" with</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">"misguided attempt" - although I can
think of other, more juicy</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">adjectives ;-)</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New"> If we would like to comment on the
unsatisfactory informality of</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">current arrangements with root server operators,
may I suggest</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">something like the following:</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">The current administration of the DNS root depends
on distributed and</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">redundant operation of the root name servers by a
dozen independent</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">organizations. Although this system's
performance has been acceptable</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">to date, it is remarkable that it is based
entirely on informal</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">agreements with the operators. This
threatens to undermine the</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">credibility of ICANN as a legitimate, responsible
custodian of the DNS.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">The DNS has become vital to international
electronic communication and</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">commerce and the root is the lynchpin of the
entire system. Surely</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">more business-like arrangements are called for in
order to ensure the</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">stability and security of the DNS root in the future.
If ICANN is to</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">convince the international community that it is
competent and worthy of</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">the authority it bears, it must operate in a more
professional fashion.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New"> </font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Feel free to change this in any way you like to
make it fit into the</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">document. Comments?</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Greg</font></tt><br>
<br>
<br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">__________________________________________________</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Do You Yahoo!?</font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around </font></tt><br>
<tt><font face="Courier New">http://mail.yahoo.com </font></tt><br>
<br>
</span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>