<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m =
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3676" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE>@font-face {
        font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
        font-family: Calibri;
}
@page Section1 {size: 612.0pt 792.0pt; margin: 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"
}
A:link {
        COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
        COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
        COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
        COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P.MsoListParagraph {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
LI.MsoListParagraph {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
DIV.MsoListParagraph {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
SPAN.EmailStyle17 {
        COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-compose
}
.MsoChpDefault {
        mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
        page: Section1
}
OL {
        MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0cm
}
UL {
        MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0cm
}
</STYLE>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-US vLink=purple link=blue>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=312420806-02062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Regarding the GNSO endorsement of AoC applicants I have to
correct what I've said yesterday. Sorry, I was a little bit confused about the
process and may have confused others, too.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=312420806-02062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=312420806-02062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>The status is as follows:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=312420806-02062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=312420806-02062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2><U>Timeline suggested by ICANN: </U></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=312420806-02062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=312420806-02062010>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d">October 1<SUP>st</SUP> –
beginning activities RTs 2 and 4<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d">September 20 – final list of
candidates delivered to Selectors for selection of members<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d">August 1<SUP>st</SUP> – closing
of the application period<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d">June 25 (end Bxl meeting) –
launching of call for applicants</SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><SPAN
class=312420806-02062010></SPAN></SPAN> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><STRONG><SPAN
class=312420806-02062010>This means that the GNSO council has to vote on
endorsement process prior to the Brussels meeting. The intention is to vote on
June 10</SPAN>.</STRONG></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #1f497d"><STRONG></STRONG></SPAN> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><SPAN
class=312420806-02062010>From CSG side the IPC (Kristina R.) and CBUC (Zahid J.)
and myself are in the draftind team. Although IPC and CBUC did not actively
participate there was not yet any intervention from their side regarding the
process intented. I myself think that the process is applicable and - in case 4
slots should be allocated to the GNSO - the best we could
achieve.</SPAN></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><SPAN
class=312420806-02062010></SPAN></SPAN> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><SPAN
class=312420806-02062010>I'd like to suggest that you'd comment on the process
and the motion attached asap. E.g. the motion could be amended in parts, for
example not to cover all futere RT's rather than RT's 2 and 4.</SPAN></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><SPAN
class=312420806-02062010></SPAN></SPAN> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><SPAN
class=312420806-02062010>Apologies for the confusion!</SPAN></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"></SPAN> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p><SPAN
class=312420806-02062010><U>Draft
motion:</U></SPAN></o:p></SPAN></P></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<P>Whereas, in furtherance of ICANN’s responsibilities under the Affirmation of
Commitment (AOC), the GNSO Council formed a drafting team to develop a process
to endorse volunteers to serve on the each of the AOC review teams;</P>
<P>Whereas, the AOC Review Requirements Drafting team (AOC-RR Drafting Team) has
proposed a process to facilitate such GNSO Council endorsements;</P>
<P>Whereas, the GNSO Council desires to adopt the AOC-RR Drafting Team proposed
process for all future AOC review team selections;</P>
<P>NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:</P>
<P>Resolved, that the GNSO Council hereby approves the Endorsement Process
described in the attached document <insert link to document>;</P>
<P>Resolved further, that the GNSO Council should implement the Endorsement
Process for all future AOC review team selections, including the “WHOIS Policy”
and the “Security, Stability, and Resiliency of the DNS” Review Teams; and</P>
<P>RESOLVED FURTHER, ICANN Staff is requested to post and distribute the
Endorsement Process as widely as possible to all GNSO related groups in an
effort to inform qualified applicants of the important work of the “WHOIS
Policy” and “Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS” review teams.</P>
<P><SPAN class=312420806-02062010>The <U>Draft process</U> is included in the
document attached.</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=312420806-02062010></SPAN> </P></DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format --><BR>
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Regards</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN
lang=de><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Wolf-Ulrich</FONT></SPAN> </P>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=de dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>Von:</B> owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im Auftrag von
</B>Tonyarholmes@btinternet.com<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Dienstag, 1. Juni 2010
23:26<BR><B>An:</B> ispcp@icann.org<BR><B>Betreff:</B> [ispcp] ISPCP
issues<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB>All <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Today conference call covered the
following issues.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph
style="TEXT-INDENT: -18pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><SPAN
lang=EN-GB><SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore">1.<SPAN
style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">
</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN><![endif]><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Response to Rod Beckstrom
request to the ISPCP on security issues.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB>The proposed draft was discussed. The plan
is to forward the final version to ICANN tomorrow. The draft is attached.
Please respond promptly with any final comments.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph
style="TEXT-INDENT: -18pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><SPAN
lang=EN-GB><SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore">2.<SPAN
style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">
</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN><![endif]><SPAN lang=EN-GB>GNSO
Priorities<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB>The proposed list of priorities will be
discussed during next week’s GNSO call. Please supply any comment to
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben and Jaime Wagner in advance of that
meeting.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph
style="TEXT-INDENT: -18pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><SPAN
lang=EN-GB><SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore">3.<SPAN
style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">
</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN><![endif]><SPAN lang=EN-GB>GNSO endorsement of AoC
applicants.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Clarity was sought between the overall
selection process and the role of the GNSO. It was noted that the GNSO is
likely to be endorsing just 4 slots, instead of 6. The intention is to
finalise the selection process ASAP, but this will still allow discussion to
take place at the Brussels meeting before final agreements are in
place.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph
style="TEXT-INDENT: -18pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><SPAN
lang=EN-GB><SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore">4.<SPAN
style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">
</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN><![endif]><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Implementation of new
gTLDs<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Concern has been voiced by some parties
over the process where IDN applications are evaluated for string
similarity against gTLDs in other scripts. Arguments have been made that in
some cases the degree of confusion arising may greatly differ and in some
cases where it is minor, a different approach may be considered. This will be
discussed further at the Brussels meeting.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph
style="TEXT-INDENT: -18pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><SPAN
lang=EN-GB><SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore">5.<SPAN
style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">
</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN><![endif]><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Date of next
call<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Thursday 10<SUP>th</SUP> June at 15.00
UTC<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB>The agenda for the ISPCP meeting will be
determined on this call.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>