<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19222"></HEAD>
<BODY
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=093000312-26062012>FYI</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format --><BR>
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Best regards</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Wolf-Ulrich</FONT></SPAN> </P>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=de class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>Von:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im Auftrag von </B>Thomas
Rickert<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Dienstag, 26. Juni 2012 13:11<BR><B>An:</B> GNSO
Council List<BR><B>Betreff:</B> [council] informal batching discussion -
summary and conclusions <BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV apple-content-edited="true"><SPAN
style="WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT: medium Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"
class=Apple-style-span><SPAN
style="WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT: medium Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"
class=Apple-style-span>
<DIV
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space">
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span>Councillors,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span>this is a follow-up to the invitation that I sent to
the list earlier. </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span>Please feel free to share the document with your
respective groups.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span>Thomas</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span>On Monday, June 25, an informal group of community
members convened to exchange thoughts on potential answers to the questions of
Batching and Digital Archery. </SPAN></FONT>
<DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px" class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px" class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" class=Apple-style-span>The group did not
neither craft nor agree on a common proposal to present to the ICANN Board
since the time available did not allow for an attempt to do so. A huge
number of ideas and suggestions were presented and commented
on. </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px" class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px" class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" class=Apple-style-span>With this
document, I would like to briefly summarize those and more ideas that were
brought to my attention in follow-up discussions and try to structure them.
The conclusions I will draw do not represent the group's view, but my personal
thoughts based on the cumulative input.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px" class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>The main areas of discussion were</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px" class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" class=Apple-style-span>- Application
Evaluation Batching and</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>- Delegation Batching.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>However, the subjects of Digital Archery as well
as the impact of the letter by the GAC to the ICANN Board on any proposal were
also discussed and deemed necessary factors when defining what could be a
superior solution to the current approach.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>The group also felt that more data was needed to
come up with a sound proposal in order to base calculations on facts rather
than guesses. Apart from questions on parameters of the contracts with the
firms that have been tasked to carry out the evaluation, the question of the
maximum delegation rate per day or week was of interest to anticipate
potential roll-out scenarios in the delegation phase. Kurt Pritz responded to
this both in the informal meeting as well as during the public session. In
summary, there does not seem to be a clear answer with unambiguous figures
rather than the fact that the 1000 TLDs somewhat need to be distributed over
the year i.e is a rate per year.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>For the evaluation phase, there seemed to be a
lot of support and little or no opposition to processing all applications in a
single batch. That should be done as quickly as possible. While Kurt Pritz
emphasized that quality is of highest priority and that it is not easy to add
more evaluators since they have been trained for months, ICANN should try to
deploy more resources. There is partially identical information in
applications using the same Registry Service Provider and those of portfolio
applicants. For these (and I am not suggesting that these should be processed
in batches), only the the differences of the applications have to be
identified, i.e. the evaluator would process one in total and then be able to
concentrate on the variations of the applications and the impact of those on
the assessment of the application. By doing so, it should be possible to
expedite the evaluation process significantly. I understand that there are
other proposals currently being drafted which focus exclusively on incasing
process efficiency.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>There did not seem to be an unanimous view on
whether all results of initial evaluation should be published at the same time
or whether they should be published as their evaluation is completed. A
proposal was made to publish the results for individual applications as the
initial evaluation is completed and then queue them for delegation as they are
ready to go until the delegation rate limit of 1000 TLDs per year is
reached. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>Numerous proposals have been made to establish a
sequence of processing and then delegating TLDs. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>These can roughly be grouped into the following
categories:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>- Clustering</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>Several participants argued for different
treatment for different types of applications, such as IDNs, geoTLDs,
Community TLDs, grouping by competitors (applicants should tell who should not
be delegated earlier than their application), grouping not only by contention
sets, but also by synonyms (i.e. .music should be grouped with
.hiphop).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>- Financial </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>Proposals were made to provide financial
incentives to those who agree to be processed later or to give each applicant
one point and that such points can be traded.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>- Choice</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>Applicants should get the opportunity to opt-out
and portfolio applicants could volunteer to prioritize their own
applications. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>- Natural sequencing</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>Several attendees pointed to the fact that there
will be a natural sequencing because of contention sets, objections, extended
evaluations, GAC Advice, differences of time required for contract negotiation
and execution.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>In addition to that, withdrawals or rejections
of applications will further reduce the number of TLDs that need to be
delegated.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>Another idea was to use the quality of the
applications as a basis for sequencing them, eg. by scoring them or taking
into account the requirement to get back to the applicant for additional
information.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>Conclusions:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>It seems like creating groups of applications,
such as IDNs, geoTLDs etc., is not an approach that gets broad community
support. No matter how legitimate the reasons brought forward may be to either
prioritize those or at least ensure that they are not processed at the end of
the queue, it seems unrealistic to serve all these groups.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>Thus, it will be difficult to establish a new
methodology for clustering applications as the basis for creating an order for
processing and delegating them.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>A combination of various elements described
above could be an eligible solution. These elements could be:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>- Resources: ICANN should hire more resources to
provide for an expedient evaluation taking into account the suggestions
above.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>- Choice: Applicants should say whether the
earliest possible delegation is of high, medium or low priority for them. The
applications will be processed in that order.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>- Complexity: In terms of complexity, a
distinction needs to be made between external and internal
factors. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>Internal factors: Priority is given to
applications with, i.e. where no additional information has to be requested
and where no extended evaluation is required. This addresses the widely
welcome idea that quality should be a factor.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>External factors: Where contentions, objections
or GAC advice are given, the applications are processed in the order these
issues are resolved. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px" class=Apple-style-span
size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>The results of the initial evaluation of
applications where no clarifying information had to be provided by the
applicant was required, should be published at the same time. For the
remaining applications, the results should be published whenever the
evaluation is completed. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>The applications will then be processed whenever
the respective next stage is reached. There will be a natural sequencing
because of different time needed for contract negotiations and
execution.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px" class=Apple-style-span
size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4>It should also be noted that the delegation
process is not under ICANN's exclusive control, which will provide for
additional sequencing.</FONT></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></FONT></DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span>Again, this document and the conclusion is an attempt
to summarize and amalgamate proposals and feedback into what might be a
possible approach. It is an effort in personal capacity which does not
necessarily represent the view of the participants. </SPAN></FONT>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span>Please circulate to those who are interested. I will
collect feedback and make that available later this week.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
class=Apple-style-span>Thomas Rickert</SPAN></FONT></DIV><BR><BR>
<DIV apple-content-edited="true"><SPAN
style="WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT: medium Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"
class=Apple-style-span><SPAN
style="WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT: medium Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"
class=Apple-style-span>
<DIV
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space"><SPAN
style="WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT: medium Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"
class=Apple-style-span>
<DIV
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space">___________________________________________________________</DIV>
<DIV
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space">Thomas
Rickert, Attorney at Law<BR>Director Names &
Numbers<BR><BR>-------------------------------------<BR>eco - Verband der
deutschen Internetwirtschaft e.V.<BR><BR>Lichtstraße 43h<BR>50825
Köln<BR><BR>Fon: +49 (0) 221 - 70 00 48 - 0<BR>Fax:
+49 (0) 221 - 70 00 48 - 111<BR>E-Mail: <A
href="mailto:thomas.rickert@eco.de">thomas.rickert@eco.de</A><BR>Web:
<A
href="http://www.eco.de/">http://www.eco.de</A><BR><BR>---------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>eco
- Verband der deutschen Internetwirtschaft e.V.<BR>Geschäftsführer:
Harald A. Summa<BR>Vorstand: Prof. Michael Rotert (Vorsitzender), Oliver
Süme (stv.<BR>Vorsitzender), Klaus Landefeld, Thomas von Bülow, Felix
Höger<BR>Vereinsregister: Amtsgericht Köln, VR 14478<BR>Sitz des Vereins:
Köln<BR><BR></DIV></SPAN></DIV></SPAN></SPAN></DIV></DIV></SPAN></SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>