<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m =
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19328">
<STYLE><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></STYLE>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-US link=blue vLink=purple>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=906284703-29102012>Sorry for being a bit late with this since Margie's
deadline is <STRONG>today, Oct 29.</STRONG> </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=906284703-29102012><STRONG></STRONG></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=906284703-29102012>I've already added ISPCP support for each of the
recommendations themselves. Please check and comment if any.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Best regards</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Wolf-Ulrich
</FONT></SPAN></P><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=de class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>Von:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im Auftrag von </B>Margie
Milam<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2012 22:05<BR><B>An:</B>
council@gnso.icann.org<BR><B>Betreff:</B> [council] Updated WHOIS RT FInal
Report Recommendations<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=WordSection1>
<P class=MsoNormal>Dear All,<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal>As discussed last week, I updated the draft WHOIS RT
summary chart to include the clarifications requested by the ISP Constituency,
and to include a column clarifying whether there was agreement with the
<I>substance </I>of each recommendation, based upon the comments submitted in
the Public Comment Forum (PCF) for the WHOIS Review Team Final
Report. <o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal>In reviewing the <A
href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/report-comments-whois-rt-final-report-11jul12-en.pdf">comments</A>
filed in the PCF, I did not locate submissions from each constituency/SG,
making it difficult to complete the chart. Notably missing were
comments from Registrars, NCSG, or the IPC on the Final Report (although in
some cases there were submissions on the draft report). In
addition, from the comments actually submitted, it was not clear whether
the commentators agreed/disagreed with the recommendation itself, since many
of the comments appeared to address aspects of the recommendations, as opposed
to evaluating the recommendation holistically.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal>As a result, it is important that each
constituency/stakeholder group review the information contained in the
attached chart, and indicate whether they agree/disagree with each of the
recommendations. <o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: red">Please provide this information by
COB Monday, October 29, 2012</SPAN>, so that the chart can be finalized in
advance of the Board’s consideration of the WHOIS RT Final Report
Recommendations.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal>All the best,<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal>Margie<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B>_______<o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B><o:p> </o:p></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B>Margie Milam<o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B>Senior Policy Counselor<o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B>ICANN<o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B>_______<o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B><o:p> </o:p></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B><o:p> </o:p></B></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>