<html xmlns:ns2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--a:link
{mso-style-priority:99;}
span.MSOHYPERLINK
{mso-style-priority:99;}
a:visited
{mso-style-priority:99;}
span.MSOHYPERLINKFOLLOWED
{mso-style-priority:99;}
p.MSOLISTPARAGRAPH
{mso-style-priority:34;}
li.MSOLISTPARAGRAPH
{mso-style-priority:34;}
div.MSOLISTPARAGRAPH
{mso-style-priority:34;}
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msolistparagraph, li.msolistparagraph, div.msolistparagraph
{margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:36.0pt;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;}
span.EstiloCorreo18
{font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EstiloCorreo19
{font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
/* List Definitions */
ol
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang="ES" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">All,</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">We seem to be getting to the end of this matter, but I need your opinion on the questions posted by Berry Cobb.</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">In general there was no support to waive the fees of the TMCH fro the IGO and INGO.</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">With respect to these specific questions:</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">1.- I don’t have the background on the GAC and ALAC standing for filing objections, though I understand the reason for GAC’s.
I would support waiving the fees for the qualifying IGOs and INGOs.</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">2.- The same</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">3.- I don’t understand the question, maybe due to some translation issue. It seems to mean that the IGO or INGO that has
an objection would have to go through the GAC. If this is the case, it would be a GAC issue and I don’t think the GSO or its members would have anything to say about it.</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Hoping to hear from you,</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Best regards,</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Osvaldo</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
<hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" tabindex="-1">
</span></font></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">De:</span></font></b><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma"> owner-gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ing<span lang="ES">o@icann.org</span><span lang="ES">] <b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">En nombre de </span></b>Berry Cobb<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Enviado el:</span></b> Viernes, 03 de Mayo de 2013 14:36<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Para:</span></b> gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Asunto:</span></b> [gnso-igo-ingo] Topic #3 - IGO-INGO Equivalent Standing for Objections</span></span></font></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt">Hi All,</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt"> </span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt">Judging by the responses and the Chair’s assessment thus far, it appears that there is not much support for Fee Waivers at the various levels of the protection
mechanisms discussed, with the exception at the top-level for future applications of gTLDs. We ask that the WG stakeholders respond to the following questions in the context that an organization’s identifiers would not be placed on a reserved names list or
listed in the Applicant Guidebook as ineligible for registration:</span></font></p>
<p class="msolistparagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt">1.<font size="1" face="Times New Roman"><span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></font></span></font><span lang="EN-US">Is there support for IGO, IOC, and RCRC to have equivalent standing similar to the GAC and ALAC for filing objections against top-level applications for gTLDs? (Note that there is no charge of a filing fee for
that GAC and ALAC)</span></p>
<p class="msolistparagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt">2.<font size="1" face="Times New Roman"><span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></font></span></font><span lang="EN-US">If there is no support for equivalent standing, is there support for a fee reduction for filing objections to new gTLD applications by IGO, IOC, and RCRC?</span></p>
<p class="msolistparagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt">3.<font size="1" face="Times New Roman"><span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></font></span></font><span lang="EN-US">If there is no support for either concept, what are your thoughts about the organizations seeking protection to collaborate with the GAC for gTLD applications where an objection is being considered?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt"> </span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt">We will discuss this topic at our 8 May 2013 conference call.</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt"> </span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt">Thank you for your input. B</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt"> </span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt">Berry</span></font><span lang="EN-US"> Cobb</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt">720.839.5735</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt"><a href="mailto:mail@berrycobb.com">mail@berrycobb.com</a></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt">@berrycobb</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt"> </span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt"> </span></font></p>
</div>
<br>
<hr>
<font face="Arial" color="Gray" size="1">El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique
al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las
específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información<br>
<br>
<br>
This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy
of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>