<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV>After reading Avri's proposal with more diligence and discussing it with
Anne from IPC, I understand it being intended to avoid any <U>GNSO (council)
resolutions</U> on the matter. That to my knowledge means the GNSO as a whole,
not single SGs or Cs. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In addition, I understand now that the motion makes sense only if the last
para stays (maybe in a modified version):</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>“...</DIV>
<DIV>to working through the process as agreed upon in the charter before</DIV>
<DIV>making any resolutions declaring support or opposition to possible
outcomes.</DIV>
<DIV>...”</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The IPC’s concern is related to the duration of the process and they’re
looking to impose a deadline like “...as long as the CCWG meetings in Dublin
continue.”</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Further discussion is needed</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Best regards</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Wolf-Ulrich</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- </DIV>
<DIV>From: Avri Doria </DIV>
<DIV>Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:08 AM </DIV>
<DIV>To: <council@gnso.icann.org> </DIV>
<DIV>Subject: [council] possible motion - would need to request 10 day waiver.
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>To my fellow council members,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I would like to offer one last motion before I end my tenure on the
GNSO</DIV>
<DIV>council.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I know I have missed the motion deadline and therefore request</DIV>
<DIV>consideration for waiver of the 10 day rule for motions, noting that</DIV>
<DIV>this request is submitted at least 24 hours before the meeting
scheduled</DIV>
<DIV>for 21 October 2015.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I also note that I am available to consider any friendly amendments
that</DIV>
<DIV>might be required for acceptance of the resolution that might come
based</DIV>
<DIV>on Stakeholder Group and Constituency consideration of this motion.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>--- Motion</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Whereas</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On 13 November 2014 the GNSO approved the charter for a Cross
Community</DIV>
<DIV>Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountabilty);</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On 3 August the Public Comment on the CCWG-Accountability 2nd</DIV>
<DIV>Draft Proposal was initiated, which ended on 12 Septemebr 2015;</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The CCWG-Accountabilty has analyzed the comments received in the</DIV>
<DIV>review of the 2nd draft and is working toward updating its reference</DIV>
<DIV>implementation taking into account the concerns expressed in those
comments;</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>and The CCWG-Accountabilty is working in a considered and
collegial</DIV>
<DIV>manner to achieve a consensus solution to ICANN Accountability;</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Acknowledging</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>the superb and continuing leadership of CCWG-Accountabilty by the
team</DIV>
<DIV>which includes the GNSO appointed co-chair Thomas Rickert, to whom we</DIV>
<DIV>are grateful for his time and consistent effort;</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Resolved</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The GNSO reiterates its support for the process that is ongoing in</DIV>
<DIV>CCWG-Accountability,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>its commitment to participating in continuing discussions with the
goal</DIV>
<DIV>of finding solution with broad agreement for ICANN accountabity in</DIV>
<DIV>preparations for IANA transition, and</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>to working through the process as agreed upon in the charter before</DIV>
<DIV>making any resolutions declaring support or opposition to possible
outcomes.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>---</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>thanks,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>avri</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>---</DIV>
<DIV>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.</DIV>
<DIV>https://www.avast.com/antivirus</DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>