[ksk-change] Action #2 - Creation of a document about multiple Root KSKs and a rollover

[David Conrad]

Kumar,

Thanks for the note. There has been a bit of activity in the background since the ICANN meeting related to rollover, albeit not on the document mentioned.  We'll be sending something out probably early next week. 

WRT the document, as I've found I'm a bit busier than I anticipated, I'm in the process of trying to identify someone who will be able to take on the document shepherding task.  I have a candidate in mind, but that person doesn't yet know it (:)).  However, if someone else wants to volunteer...

Regards,
-drc

On Nov 19, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Kumar Ashutosh <askuma at microsoft.com> wrote:

> Putting it back on top of your mailbox. What is next on this action item?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ksk-rollover-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ksk-rollover-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Warren Kumari
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 10:40 PM
> To: Dan York
> Cc: ksk-rollover at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [ksk-change] Action #2 - Creation of a document about multiple Root KSKs and a rollover
> 
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Dan York <york at isoc.org> wrote:
>> Action #2 - We agreed that we need to create a document that outlines 
>> items such as (and this is NOT a complete list):
>>  - How could it work to have multiple Root KSKs?  What would be involved?
>>  - What would be the logistics look like for a keyroll?
>>  - What are the concerns about rollback?
>> 
>> Lead:  David Conrad (DRC) said that he (or someone he finds) will take 
>> lead on this document.
>> 
>> Participants:  Mads, Kumar, Joe
>> 
>> Several other people contacted me afterwards saying that they would be 
>> interested and need to figure out if they can with schedules, etc.  
>> (And now is the time they can say if they are in fact able to help 
>> with the document... )
>> 
>> Q FOR LIST:  Who else would like to work on this document?
>> 
> 
> Bah. Sure.
> W
> 
>> Please reply back to the list.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dan
>> 
>> --
>> Dan York
>> Senior Content Strategist, Internet Society
>> york at isoc.org   +1-802-735-1624
>> Jabber: york at jabber.isoc.org
>> Skype: danyork   http://twitter.com/danyork
>> 
>> http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ksk-rollover mailing list
>> ksk-rollover at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ksk-rollover
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants.
>   ---maf
> _______________________________________________
> ksk-rollover mailing list
> ksk-rollover at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ksk-rollover
> _______________________________________________
> ksk-rollover mailing list
> ksk-rollover at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ksk-rollover

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ksk-rollover/attachments/20141120/cc0ad1d2/signature.asc>