[ksk-rollover] root zone KSK rollover operations workshop planning

[David Conrad]

Peter,

On Sep 19, 2014, at 12:08 AM, Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote:
> I was looking for the "forces” behind this and I read your response as "an ad-hoc group”.

Joe answered this pretty well.  Especially the winning smile bit.

>> At this point, we?re in exploratory mode, primarily focused on understanding the potential issues.  Neither a timeline nor a decision making process have been nailed down (as far as I know).
> 
> An interesting question - that should not derail any effort on the ops/tech
> side of things - is which function is in charge. Oversight and such, topic
> of the month.

For the purposes of the discussion related the implications and effects of key rollover, I don’t think who is in charge/who provides oversight is particularly relevant.  When we get to the point of actually changing the key, those questions become more important, but I don’t think we’re there yet (e.g., there are some that argue the key shouldn’t be changed — if that argument wins, questions related to who’s in charge don’t matter).

Regards,
-drc

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ksk-rollover/attachments/20140919/a209a420/signature.asc>