[ksk-change] planned vs. emergency (was Re: [ksk-rollover] root zone KSK ...)

David Conrad david.conrad at icann.org
Mon Sep 22 22:04:03 UTC 2014


On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Tomofumi Okubo <tomofumi.okubo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Risks could actually be dealt in four ways; mitigate, accept, transfer
> or avoid. Avoiding (not doing it) is one way but not the only way.

Perhaps there is some confusion: is anyone actually suggesting we don’t do key rollovers?

I certainly am not (if there is any doubt).

I am trying to draw assumptions and implications out so we can discuss them more fully, with some vague hope of reaching consensus.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ksk-rollover/attachments/20140922/5f40b6b6/signature.asc>

More information about the ksk-rollover mailing list