[ksk-change] planned vs. emergency (was Re: [ksk-rollover] root zone KSK ...)
S Moonesamy
sm+icann at elandsys.com
Mon Sep 22 21:32:42 UTC 2014
Hi David,
At 11:53 22-09-2014, David Conrad wrote:
>Sounds reasonable. Of course, if there are multiple keys, it may
>mean additional KMFs are necessary which means the current physical
>access strategy may not be applicable.
Within the scope of the current discussion I do not think that the
current physical assess strategy is a problem. I suggest thinking
very carefully about "additional KMFs" before even floating that idea.
>It isn't a question of want. You are assuming there is an option to
>not authorize an emergency key roll?
It is a choice. In general, it is not an option which a person(s)
would blindly authorize. The planned key roll-over is also about
avoiding having to face such a choice.
>Thank you (sincerely) for your efforts. However, I've been told by
>several people that it is becoming increasingly challenging to get
>sufficient TCRs to show up for key ceremonies.
I am aware that event scheduling is a challenge. I have commented
about that on the relevant mailing list.
>I believe topics like what will break, who it will affect, and
>mitigation/recovery strategies would be useful topics for the workshop.
Agreed.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
More information about the ksk-rollover
mailing list