[ksk-rollover] 答复: Observation on Large response issue during Yeti KSK rollover

[Davey Song(宋林健)]

Yes.

It would be better if there was a comparison between IPv4 and IPv6. But we only have IPv6 traffic. 

In the initial setting ,there is a same group of probes using TCP as a comparison in case of routing problem or other network failure. But some probes I chose have some bugs sending DNS over TCP at a old version. 

Do you guys have similar testing or reference of other's work providing quantitative result on this regard? I mean the degree of impact due to large response in IPv6 (or IPv4) network. I'm not sure the result I got (less than 1% misbehave) is a common sense or not.

Davey
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwessels at verisign.com]
> 发送时间: 2017年8月2日 23:16
> 收件人: Davey Song(宋林健)
> 抄送: ksk-rollover at icann.org
> 主题: Re: [ksk-rollover] Observation on Large response issue during Yeti KSK
> rollover
> 
> Thanks Davey,
> 
> Just to make sure I understand, these are IPv6-only measurements and results,
> correct?
> 
> DW
> 
> 
> > On Aug 2, 2017, at 2:31 AM, Davey Song(宋林健) <ljsong at biigroup.cn>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi ICANN KSK rollover team,
> >
> > For your information, I have an observation on large response impacts during
> Yeti KSK rollover. Please check the article.
> >
> >
> http://yeti-dns.org/yeti/blog/2017/08/02/large-packet-impact-during-yeti-ksk-r
> ollover.html
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Davey
> > _______________________________________________
> > ksk-rollover mailing list
> > ksk-rollover at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ksk-rollover