[ksk-rollover] (Un)planning future KSK replacements

Olaf Kolkman kolkman at isoc.org
Thu Mar 28 09:23:31 UTC 2019

On 28 Mar 2019, at 10:14, Salz, Rich via ksk-rollover wrote:

> At the BoF at IETF 104 I suggested the following.
> Make the next KSK rollover scheduled.  After that, do not announce them. It is the only way to train the infrastructure to be ready to handle emergencies.

May I propose we call these Stochastic Key rolls. ;-)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ksk-rollover/attachments/20190328/8bdda293/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3723 bytes
Desc: S/MIME digital signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ksk-rollover/attachments/20190328/8bdda293/smime-0001.p7s>

More information about the ksk-rollover mailing list