<html><head></head><body>Hi Dan, <br><br>I found evidence of a software but that may have caused some of the traffic increase. I'm waiting for a bug report to be released as it's being looked into now. Though my guess was it wouldn't drop after the key removal, so I'll stay tuned too! <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On March 22, 2019 1:45:04 PM PDT, Dan York <york@isoc.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail"><br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">On Mar 22, 2019, at 1:45 PM, Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org> wrote:<br><br>On 22/03/2019 17:12, Matt Larson wrote:<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;">The root zone without KSK-2010 went out ~1440 UTC. We've already seen a massive drop in DNSKEY queries from everywhere we have data. Note the graph below.<br></blockquote><br>I'm seeing the same on our F-root nodes - a 95% reduction on the volume seen a couple of days ago.<br></blockquote><br><br>Do we have an understanding of WHY we are seeing the massive drop in volume? (Or why we saw the massive volume in the first place?)<br><br>Just curious,<br>Dan<br><br>--<br>Dan York<br>Director of Web Strategy, Internet Society<br>york@isoc.org +1-603-439-0024 <br>Jabber: york@jabber.isoc.org Skype: danyork <a href="http://twitter.com/danyork">http://twitter.com/danyork</a><br><br><a href="http://www.internetsociety.org/">http://www.internetsociety.org/</a><hr>ksk-rollover mailing list<br>ksk-rollover@icann.org<br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ksk-rollover">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ksk-rollover</a><br><br></pre></blockquote></div><br>Wes Hardaker <br>USC/ISI</body></html>