[Latingp] Draft in-script variants

Bill Jouris bill.jouris at insidethestack.com
Thu Aug 23 14:39:38 UTC 2018


Hi Michael, 

When we were evaluating the cross-script variant, we used a 5 point scale, with 1 and 2 being variants and 3 being confusible.  All I have done is apply the same criteria.  And just listed those at level 1, ignoring level 2 completely for the moment -- even though consistency with the cross-script variants would indicate including those as well.  

Others may disagree with that ranking, of course.  That's why we have discussions to review them.  On the other hand, I'm having trouble seeing anyone (other than maybe Dennis) rating any of these as a 3 or beyond.  Note that I haven't even started on the ones, approaching 150 in number (and I haven't finished the Letter O) which would rank level 2! 

As you note, if the IP thinks we have been too inclusive, they can say so.  On the other hand, if we don't suggest something, they would be extremely unlikely to recommend additions.  Better, then, to have our draft include more rather than fewer. 

Best Regards, Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris at insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)

      From: Michael Bauland <Michael.Bauland at knipp.de>
 To: latingp at icann.org 
 Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 2:51 AM
 Subject: Re: [Latingp] Draft in-script variants
   
Hi Bill,

On 23.08.2018 05:43, Bill Jouris wrote:
> I've taken the liberty of adding a couple dozen additional candidates. 
> (I held off the Rating 2 cases.  These are the slam dunks.)

I have a few comments regarding your suggestions.
Firstly, if we add these cases we also need to add all cases introduced
by transitivity, e.g., 0065 and 0119 and 1EB9, or 00E8 and 00E9 and 0117
and 1EB9+0300 and 1EB9+0301 should then all be variants of each other,
respectively.

Secondly, we don't have a rationale to add them, do we? We could just
say, we think that they look similar enough to allow for confusion. And
I'm not sure this is enough for the IP ... though, we could try of course.

Best regards,

Michael


-- 
____________________________________________________________________
    |      |
    | knipp |            Knipp  Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
      -------                    Technologiepark
                                Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9
                                44227 Dortmund
                                Germany

    Dipl.-Informatiker          Fon:    +49 231 9703-0
                                Fax:    +49 231 9703-200
    Dr. Michael Bauland        SIP:    Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
    Software Development        E-mail: Michael.Bauland at knipp.de

                                Register Court:
                                Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728

                                Chief Executive Officers:
                                Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp
_______________________________________________
Latingp mailing list
Latingp at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/latingp/attachments/20180823/85ab40bd/attachment.html>


More information about the Latingp mailing list