[Latingp] Homoglyphs within Latin script

[Tan Tanaka, Dennis]

Mats,

Are you saying that the panel needs to do more analysis to determine which one to include in the repertoire or is the matter that both of them will be included but you are suggesting some variant rules? On the latter, IP briefly discussed about the two code points in the feedback regarding the Principles document.

-Dennis

From: Latingp <latingp-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg at iis.se>
Date: Sunday, December 31, 2017 at 12:41 PM
To: "latingp at icann.org" <latingp at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Latingp] Homoglyphs within Latin script

There are many code points that are so similar that confusion is at risk, but there is at least one clear pair of homoglyphs:

0259

ə

LATIN SMALL LETTER SCHWA





01DD

ǝ

LATIN SMALL LETTER TURNED E



They are not homoglyphs in upper case. In two of the languages that attest either of the two, it is not possible to say which because there is no upper case letter.


Mats

---
Mats Dufberg
DNS Specialist, IIS
Mobile: +46 73 065 3899
https://www.iis.se/en/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/latingp/attachments/20180104/4cdc20a4/attachment.html>