[Latingp] Homoglyphs within Latin script
Michael Bauland
Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
Fri Jan 5 15:08:05 UTC 2018
Hi Dennis, hi Mats,
On 05.01.2018 16:02, Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp wrote:
> Thanks Mats.
>
>
>
> A follow up question, is there evidence that these two code points are
> used interchangeably in the languages the repertoire team analyzed? I
> ask because the IP will ask for more evidence of a variant relationship
> besides visual appearance. Per the Procedure “Generation Panels should
> ignore cases where the relation is based exclusively on aspects of
> visual similarity”.
I'm not sure we need additional evidence, because in this case it's not
mere "visual similarity" but those two are actually the same. And I
don't think we have another choice in the case of homoglyphs, but to
make them variants. On the contrary, I think we had to argue if we
wanted to not make them variants.
Michael
--
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
------- Technologiepark
Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9
44227 Dortmund
Germany
Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0
Fax: +49 231 9703-200
Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
Register Court:
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728
Chief Executive Officers:
Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp
More information about the Latingp
mailing list