[Latingp] Variant analysis Latin Armenian

[Mats Dufberg]

For the variant group:

After some feedback from Michael I have slightly updated my review plus defined how I use MD{+,-,#,*}:


  *   MD#: there is no Latin character to compare with
  *   MD+: the Latin character is a candidate for being a variant, independent if the character is part of MSR or the Latin GP repertoire.
  *   MD-: there is a similar character, but too different to be a candidate.
  *   MD*: unsure if MD+ or MD-.

When I have changed the character in what was Bill's original analysis, then I have set the background to be yellow.


Yours,
Mats

---
Mats Dufberg
DNS Specialist, IIS
Mobile: +46 73 065 3899
https://www.iis.se/en/


From: Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg at iis.se>
Date: Wednesday 17 January 2018 at 13:58
To: Latin GP <latingp at icann.org>
Subject: Variant analysis Latin Armenian

For the variant group:

I have completed my analysis, both my primary and my secondary (where Bill's is the primary).

I am still confused of the codes. MD+ means that I think they should be variants. MD-, MD# and MD* means that I do not think so but in different situations?

In some cases I have updated the data of Bill's analysis (but in a separate file with my tag "MD" and a date on).


Mats

---
Mats Dufberg
DNS Specialist, IIS
Mobile: +46 73 065 3899
https://www.iis.se/en/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/latingp/attachments/20180117/cb8d5047/attachment.html>