[Latingp] Latin-Cyrillic cross-script analysis

Bill Jouris bill.jouris at insidethestack.com
Thu Jul 26 19:12:18 UTC 2018

I have reviewed these.  In several cases, I believe it is possible to resolve the issue using the same principle: 
When both inspectors have the same rating for the highest ranked font, and the only difference is between fonts, there seems no reason to look further. Just take the agreed highest rating (for example 2) and move on. 

I also noticed a couple of cases where the first inspector had a rating of 5 (i.e. no candidate found) while the second inspector had something else.  Perhaps the first inspector could go back and consider the candidate which, apparently, arose after his initial inspection.  Even if that results in a rating of 4 (different), it would at least give us someplace to start discussion.
 Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris at insidethestack.com
925-855-9512 (direct)

      From: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp at icann.org>
 To: "latingp at icann.org" <latingp at icann.org> 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 12:49 PM
 Subject: [Latingp] Latin-Cyrillic cross-script analysis
 <!--#yiv6658529708 _filtered #yiv6658529708 {font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv6658529708 {font-family:DengXian;panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;} _filtered #yiv6658529708 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv6658529708 {panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}#yiv6658529708 #yiv6658529708 p.yiv6658529708MsoNormal, #yiv6658529708 li.yiv6658529708MsoNormal, #yiv6658529708 div.yiv6658529708MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv6658529708 a:link, #yiv6658529708 span.yiv6658529708MsoHyperlink {color:#0563C1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv6658529708 a:visited, #yiv6658529708 span.yiv6658529708MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv6658529708 span.yiv6658529708EmailStyle17 {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv6658529708 .yiv6658529708MsoChpDefault {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;} _filtered #yiv6658529708 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv6658529708 div.yiv6658529708WordSection1 {}-->Latin GP,    As a follow up to our meeting last week, here is the revised documenthttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ontc-amdQ_dFCRCc9oHBvotjwIhYc8xEM1OBn5yk1EI/edit?usp=sharing. However, there are still 9 cases that need to be resolve. These are the cases where there is a mixed of visual scores. Please use the comment boxes to propose a method for resolution, that is consistent with our inclusion principles.    While we solve for the Latin/Cyrillic cases I will start looking at the Greek and Armenian worksheets and apply the same framework to determine inclusion/exclusion of variant candidates.    Best, Dennis _______________________________________________
Latingp mailing list
Latingp at icann.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/latingp/attachments/20180726/7569cb37/attachment.html>

More information about the Latingp mailing list