[Latingp] Variant cross-script analysis worksheets

Tan Tanaka, Dennis dtantanaka at verisign.com
Fri May 18 20:43:26 UTC 2018


I believe we delimited the scope of variants for the Latin script in the face to face meeting in Brussels, did we not?

From: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris at insidethestack.com>
Reply-To: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris at insidethestack.com>
Date: Friday, May 18, 2018 at 2:18 PM
To: Dennis Tan Tanaka <dtantanaka at verisign.com>, Meikal Mumin <meikal at mumin.de>
Cc: Michael Bauland <Michael.Bauland at knipp.de>, "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Latingp] Variant cross-script analysis worksheets

It is pretty clear, if one reads the MSR-3 document, that we are supposed to deal with Variants.  Which include, but are NOT limited to, homoglyphs.

Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris at insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)

________________________________
From: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis" <dtantanaka at verisign.com>
To: Meikal Mumin <meikal at mumin.de>
Cc: "bill.jouris at insidethestack.com" <bill.jouris at insidethestack.com>; Michael Bauland <Michael.Bauland at knipp.de>; "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp at icann.org>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Latingp] Variant cross-script analysis worksheets


we must deal with such confusable characters or sequences of characters in the context of variants

No, we don’t. Confusability is not in scope. We established the Latin panel will deal with homoglyphs or nearly homoglyphs (i.e. font variation) in the context of cross-scripts.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/latingp/attachments/20180518/94a5a9fd/attachment.html>


More information about the Latingp mailing list