[Latingp] ACTION NEEDED: For IP: 2018-09-10 version of the Proposal for Latin script LGR
Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
Thu Sep 13 07:21:32 UTC 2018
on page 6 we write "Languages are restricted to natural human
languages", but what about Esperanto? It's not a natural language, is
it? I think it is a artificial, constructed language. Should we maybe
remove the word "natural"? Or should we change it to something like:
"Languages are restricted to natural human languages in active use plus
the widely used universal language Esperanto."
We sometimes write MSR-2 and MSR-3, and sometimes MSR2 and MSR3. Not a
big issue, but we should only use one of them (should be easily fixed by
the search and replace functionality).
Esperanto has no number in Appendix A. I guess it should be 102 and all
following languages should be changed to +1.
Some smaller changes I already applied in the attached version:
p5: I changed the colours to better match the colours of the map
p6: Some minor edits (added articles; changed definition to defining)
p36: Added an 's': sequence of code pointS
| knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0
Fax: +49 231 9703-200
Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728
Chief Executive Officers:
Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Proposal-for-LatinScriptRootZone-LGR-V3-0-submitted-20180910 (DT comments 12 Sep 18).docx
Size: 866483 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Latingp