[Latingp] Candidates for Visual Similarity Review

Tue Apr 16 21:54:48 UTC 2019

I was asked to keep a list.  So I did.  
My sense is that there are cases where, while we were able to discern a few pixels on either side of the underline (e.g. with a comma below) there remains some question whether, on a normal size font, a reasonably careful user would be able to spot the difference.  Or the difference between, for example, a comma below vs a circumflex below. 
Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris at insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct) 

    On Tuesday, April 16, 2019, 2:10:14 PM PDT, Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka at verisign.com> wrote:  

 #yiv0423772390 #yiv0423772390 -- _filtered #yiv0423772390 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv0423772390 {font-family:DengXian;panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;} _filtered #yiv0423772390 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv0423772390 {panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;} _filtered #yiv0423772390 {panose-1:2 0 5 3 0 0 0 2 0 4;}#yiv0423772390 #yiv0423772390 p.yiv0423772390MsoNormal, #yiv0423772390 li.yiv0423772390MsoNormal, #yiv0423772390 div.yiv0423772390MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv0423772390 a:link, #yiv0423772390 span.yiv0423772390MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0423772390 a:visited, #yiv0423772390 span.yiv0423772390MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0423772390 p.yiv0423772390msonormal0, #yiv0423772390 li.yiv0423772390msonormal0, #yiv0423772390 div.yiv0423772390msonormal0 {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv0423772390 span.yiv0423772390EmailStyle18 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv0423772390 .yiv0423772390MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv0423772390 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv0423772390 div.yiv0423772390WordSection1 {}#yiv0423772390 
Hi Bill,

Regarding the underlining cases… I’m trying to understand the need for a new worksheet. A bit of background could help since I missed the last meeting. Thanks

This is the one we created in Brussels https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dmx0HaO_6Iu64AXsIDjbOWM1-B9uf9rfvRRaWGRPeKg/edit?usp=sharing

Thanks,

Dennis

From:Latingp <latingp-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Bill Jouris <bill.jouris at insidethestack.com>
Reply-To: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris at insidethestack.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 4:44 PM
To: Latin GP <latingp at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Latingp] Candidates for Visual Similarity Review

By the simple expedient of listening to the recordings of the meetings, I have recreated my notes.  Apologies for the delay/confusion.  

I have also created a second tab listing the various diacritics below which create issues due to underlining. 

Please let me know any errors or omissions.

Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris at insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)

On Sunday, April 14, 2019, 11:00:53 PM PDT, Bill Jouris <bill.jouris at insidethestack.com> wrote:

Hi folks, 

Attached are the pairs we identified in our recent meetings as candidates for variants due to visual similarity.  I have the distinct impression that one of my pages on notes has gone missing, so the list may not be complete.  My apologies.  If you are aware of something I've missed, please let me know and I will add it in. 

I have highlighted in grey the pairs which I believe we have already dealt with. 

Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris at insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)

_______________________________________________
Latingp mailing list
Latingp at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/latingp/attachments/20190416/c8db8e06/attachment-0001.html>