[Latingp] Notes from the call on 4th of July, 2019

[Mirjana Tasić]

Dear GP members,

Please find included some notes from our last call. Every comment, suggestion or update are appreciated.

Regards Mirjana




Notes from the call on 4th of July, 2019



1.      URL Underlining analysis completed

2.      Appendix D merger –

Meikal made an oversight using Trello tool<https://trello.com/c/BoKkXTzF/1-in-script-variants-analysis> for keeping track what is missing in Appendix D. There are 14 items more which should be analyzed,  beside some other items which are not finished by GP members from previous  assignment. All assigned and not completed  items has in the title of item the code(1 to 7) which marks to whom the item was assigned.
The  assignment of  new 14 new items is proposed as follows:

No
Item
GP member

1.
Shape: Ring above vs Hook Above
1

2.
Shape: Ring above vs Dot Above
2

3.
Shape: Caron vs Horn above
3

4.
Stacking: Circumflex (above)  and dot below
4

5.
Stacking: Breve above and dot below
5

6.
Stacking: Grave and dot below
6

7.
Stacking: Acute and dot below
7

8.
Stacking: Horn and Acute above
1

9.
Stacking: Horn and Tilde above
3

10.
Stacking: Horn and Dot below
4

11.
Stacking: Acute vs non acute
5

12.
IDNA Compatibility: i vs dotless i (overlaps with base character analysis)
6

13.
IDNA Compatibility: Sharp s vs sequence ss
2

14.
Visual analysis : turned e  vs schwa
7

Finished analysis could be inserted in Appendix D merger<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nGIerPh21yxPHuuSyNo2uShanvFzD0MUb1ai6QV4iro/edit#heading=h.3znysh7>, or sent to the list in an  e-mail.

  1.  Seven members of the GP will get accounts with wordmark.it. Pitinan will inform GP when accounts will be ready for use.
  2.  GP decided to use rest of the time in the call to look at Michaels contribution in the report  about sharp s  vs ss and his consultations with  German, Austrian and Swiss ccTLD.  This part of the report is cleaned of some remarks, but it should be discussed again with  other GP members which were not present on this call.
  3.  Visual Analysis of in-script variants was also added to the agenda. Meikal said that  in this topic all homoglyphs in the script should be analyzed. Up to now he has proposed only one

“turned e  vs schwa”

It was proposed that all members of the panel should pass through the defined Repertoire and propose any other code points for Visual analysis.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/latingp/attachments/20190708/3446d83f/attachment-0001.html>