[Latingp] Underlining
Michael Bauland
Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
Thu Sep 5 12:50:24 UTC 2019
Hi Bill,
On 04.09.2019 23:42, Bill Jouris wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> As requested, I have updated the Proposal (Section 6.7.1) with our
> decisions for Variants Due To Underlining.
thanks for your work.
> I would like to note one small inconsistency in our results. Basic
> letters are considered variants of the same letter with a cedilla for
> letters K, L, N, S, and T. But *not* for letters C, M, and O. It seems
> to me that we really ought to be consistent in this. (As we are for Dot
> Below, Macron Below, Circumflex Below, Ogonek, etc.)
Good catch. I agree that we should try to be consistent. And in case
there is a good reason that requires us to be "inconsistent" we at least
have to argue and comment why we handle those seemingly equivalent cases
differently.
As mentioned last week, I will be in a car driving to a customer during
our call and I don't like driving and using the phone (even with a
hands-free kit) at the same time. So I won't be able to join. Therefore
my vote (in case you need it in this call) for this case:
Looking at our original documents my opinion is to not considering base
characters and characters with cedilla below as variants.
Talk to you next week,
Michael
--
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
------- Technologiepark
Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9
44227 Dortmund
Germany
Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0
Fax: +49 231 9703-200
Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
Register Court:
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728
Chief Executive Officers:
Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp
More information about the Latingp
mailing list